Advertisement

08th/10th Pass Jobs- Apply Now

KPSC KAS Results (Gazetted Probationers) 2018 KPSC KAS Cut Off Score, Eligibility List for main

Advertisement

KPSC KAS Result 2017-2018. KAS Gazetted Probationers Results & Eligibility List for the Main exam. KPSC KAS GP Results Declaration Date. Karnataka PSC Gazetted Probationers Prelims exam Expected Cut Off Scores (Discussion)|

Advertisement

We are starting an opinion poll to get the average scoring marks to know the actual cut-off marks. Please share your estimated marks in the poll. By doing this we can calculate the KAS Cut-off score for the Preliminary Examination.

KPSC KAS Preliminary Exam Result & Cutoff Score details

The Karnataka Public Service Service has successfully completed a preliminary examination for Gazetted Probationers in the State Administrative Services (KAS) on 20 August 2017. In the next phase, the recruitment authority will announce the result for this exam. The KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers (GP) Result is likely to be declared within two or three months. The candidates can check the KAS GP Result by using the Login ID (Application No.) and Password (Date of Birth) on the official website.

In 2015, a recruitment for 401 posts of KAS Gazetted Probationers in various departments of the Karnataka State. Applications were invited from the eligible candidates for these posts. As per the organizational information, A large number of candidates shown interest in this recruitment. A massive number of applications were received. The authority conducts a written examination (Prelims) for the registered candidates on 20.08.2017 respectively.

KPSC Gazetted Probationers Result

Organization’s NameKarnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC)
Name of PostGazetted Probationers
Total VacanciesGroup A – 150

Group B – 251

Total Posts – 401

KPSC Gazetted Probationers Written Examination (Prelims) Date20 August 2017
KPSC Gazetted Probationers Result Declaration Date———
Websitehttp://www.kpsc.kar.nic.in/

 

The KAS Gazetted Probationers Preliminary Exam took place on 20/08/2017. A massive number of candidates appeared in the examination. The candidates who have been a part of the test are eagerly waiting for the result for the same.

The KAS recruitment authority will announce the KPSC Preliminary Exam result as soon as possible. The result is likely to be declared in the third week of October. The candidates will be able to check the KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result by using the application registration number and date of birth.

KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result get

The Commission releases KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result 2017 in online or offline mode. In case, if the results are released in online mode, the applicants have to visit the official website and enter their login credentials such as Registration No. and Date of Birth. After entering these details, the detail will generate your result on the desktop screen. Now you can check your KPSC Gazetted Probationers results and can also get the provisional result sheet for future reference.

Whereas, to check the KPSC Result KAS Prelims Result 2017 through offline mode, the candidates have to get the result in pdf file from the official website. In the offline, the Commission will upload the KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result 2017 in Pdf format. In which all the qualified candidate’s Registration No. and Name is provided. The candidates can use Ctrl+F in order to search their Registration No. to check the result. The Commission will upload mark sheet on the official website after declaring the KPSC Administrative Services Exam Result 2017. The candidates can get the result sheet for the provisional use.

KPSC Gazetted Probationers Cut Off Scores

The Preliminary Examination had two papers with each carrying 200 Marks. The applicants need to score minimum qualifying marks in each paper to qualify. The candidates who qualify in the preliminary examination are eligible to appear in the mains exam. The Commission will announce the mains exam date, a few days after the declaration of KPSC KAS Prelims Exam Result 2017.

The recruitment authority will finalize the cut-off marks on the basis of difficulty of the exam, the number of applications received vs the number of vacancies and number of appeared candidates. A notification regarding category-wise cut-off marks will be published on the official web portal. The candidates will be intimated on their registered email id and mobile number also.

How to check KPSC KAR Gazetted Probationers Result 2017:

  • First of all, visit the official website at http://www.kpsc.kar.nic.in/
  • Find the detail named KPSC Gazetted Probationers (Prelims) Result
  • . on the detail and Fill the required details like reg no. & Pass
  • Check the filled information and . on the proceed button
  • The KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result will be shown on your desktop screen
  • get it and take a valid print out for provisional use

20,424 thoughts on “KPSC KAS Results (Gazetted Probationers) 2018 KPSC KAS Cut Off Score, Eligibility List for main”

  1. Honourable Supreme Court diluted the provisions of SC ST Prevention of atrocities Act n brought several changes to it , , but later government Brought ordinance n also amendment Bill to nullify the changes made by honourable Supreme Court , ,,, So nothing is final or supreme in this country , ,, Both Judiciary n Legislative have equal options n choices within the Constitutional framework , ,,,No need to worry ,,, Though the Kumar Judgement came in 2016 , it was questioned in SC n verdict came in September , , Now government is filing review petition in SC , ,, So the question of Contempt of Court does not arise,,

    Reply
  2. @appa, lollllll??? if you have confident of clearing exam why are you visiting this site???
    Why do you worry about new rules and old rules?

    Go and focus on interview preparation don’t waste your time here….

    Yeno dodda Lord dabak das aadida haage aadtavane, upsc,kpsc 100 time clear maadida haage.aadtane,
    Prelims bardillaa aasami illi scope kodtavane

    Reply
    • reservation is 50%( its consist sc+st+obc) . women and other reservation are not consider reservation bracket according to sc judgement.

      if kpsc ready to implement sc order . it can not consider women , km , rural as separate . they need to club this group into some where to make 50:50 ratio.

      it can be done at prelims stage only , now its difficult to follow . how they can sc order i dont know.

      Reply
    • If you have 100% confidence of clearing exam, then dont visit this forum, you will get one day . You don’t know the problem of GM candidates.

      Tone nodi astrology helthavane??? First ninu clear agtiya nodko? Amele bereyavara bagge matahdappa…

      Reply
    • Lol @appa im observing your comments from few days, I know you cleared in reservation quota, don’t worry if you get good marks above then GM, then your eligible to get Him post under new rules also. So don’t panic and curse anybody who are in favour of SC orders. Coz karma is bitch, it eventually returns to you only.

      Dear really you cleared prelims? Your tone speaks even you didn’t write prelims. Get life buddy

      Reply
      • sir previous one is my 1st comment. if something wrong we are all suffer from their decision.
        if they follow sc order no issue in future, thats why i am asking .
        thank you.

        Reply
  3. Friends I want to say one thing reservation is s a legal right !!n there in was big protest in BU campus to protect interests of of BC …..n HD kumaraswamy backed by all ministers n state leaders(siddaramiah etc) n natiional leaders(mallikarjun karge)have assured to pass necessary legislation ..so in no way it will be contempt of the court ..even if someone goes to court ..court wud look into both procedure established by law(which is fine) n due process of law (court will look into merits) n not as a contempt proceedings ….so kindly don’t fight here ….if u want to fight ,do it in court ..but it will not be a cake walk …!!all the best .stay focused on prep !!

    Reply
  4. Fed up with this.. Seeing all your comments, I couldn’t make any conclusion.. Bt only thing I got to know is, if kpsc doesn’t follow HC order, after provisional list someone will surely goes to court, then both GM, category candidates everybody have to suffer.. This is what I understood from your messages

    Reply
    • After final list if some goes court, GM candidates will not suffer, but those who are in GM list bybviolatig SC judgment they will suffer sure, So before announcing list govt/kpsc should release press statement reg this.

      Reply
    • reservation is 50%( its consist sc+st+obc) . women and other reservation are not consider reservation bracket according to sc judgement.

      if kpsc ready to implement sc order . it can not consider women , km , rural as separate . they need to club this group into some where to make 50:50 ratio.

      it can be done at prelims stage only , now its difficult to follow . how they can sc order i dont know

      Reply
  5. Anna @akki reg horizontal reservation kpsc following SC orders only.
    We are speaking with SC orders, if you don’t know about rules don’t speak unnecessary things, let them declare officially then we will show who is right or wrong? How it becomes contempt of court.

    Then why AG told follow court orders ? Does he also fool like us?

    We already spoke to advocates of 1998,99 batch, 2011 we have merits in our case, we are just waiting for right time.

    Court will decides who is right or wrong OK. Good luck

    Reply
  6. I am not gonna argue more.. let me clear the air for some who is blaming. i got through GM category only. I am not agaist reservation.

    Reply
    • Hello boss Here no one against reservation, we want fair policy instructed by court that’s it..

      GM-means not single community or case it includes sc,st,2a,2b,3a,3b,cat1,xmp OK.

      Reply
      • Boss
        Well if you follow recent judgement then GM definition changes. It iself becomes a reserved category, In subsequent stages.. take example of GMK candidate..

        Reply
        • Lol in final list they are eligible to get post in GM quota based on their merit, read whole judgement boss, don’t go through politicians statements bossu.

          Reply
  7. alla kanrappa enadru agli court ge hogi taglakondlilla andre saaku adella en karma guru

    kpsc and governmemt shud take care… 2011 case shudnt repeat…
    gowdru gaddala andre idena? gabbeburstare…batch na
    look at 2014 batch siddharamayya sir hats off

    Reply
    • Siddanna hesaru yako ettitya .Avaga judgement bandirlilla adukke
      Ivaga bandidie adukke changes …

      Mataddaga niga irli . Nam jaati agli Yaar jati agli jaati tarbeda

      Arta madkolak loude me ball

      Reply
    • Kempe gowda is right , this issue has cropped up after 2016 so it’s not fair to draw line with the previous recruitment . Please refrain from making caste based accusations and keep the forum clean

      Reply
  8. People spoke in this forum about nepotism,corruption, flawed process, regulation,political intervention in constitutional body etc etc etc

    But when some one (SC/HC/AG/any person) come and try to reform the flawed process, tries to make in the lines of UPSC suddenly who supported earlier now starts backing same corrupt politicians and flawed process and system. Disgusting whatever happens they want their name in list that’s it or else it becomes injustice.

    Now they wants to overrule SC decision, ware wah mera desh mahan hai.

    ಯಾರಿಗೆ ಬಂತು ಎಲ್ಲಿಗೆ ಬಂತು 47ರ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯ.

    Reply
    • Let them bark whatever, over ruling SC order becomes contempt of court. Finally if some one moves to court like umar Khalid (98batch), then people who got selected in GM quota by violating Court orders will lose the job and they have to face the consequences.
      Let Justice prevails…..

      Reply
    • For GMK cutoff was higher than GmGeneral. According to you despite having higher merit he/she should be placed under GMK only right. Does It seems right to you?. Doesn’t GMK should be able to compete in GM. In states we have lot of horizontal/vertical reservations,u can’t apply Tina dabi case here. N as far as Kumar judgement govt will bring legislation so that it will not be content of any court.If pure GM candidates score higher then they will definitely get post under GM. And more over if a GM CANDIDATE scores less than category guy in mains that means he should be thrown out of the list,is that what u imply.

      Reply
      • Anna @akki reg horizontal reservation kpsc following SC orders only.
        We are speaking with SC orders, if you don’t know about rules don’t speak unnecessary things, let them declare officially then we will show who is right or wrong? How it becomes contempt of court.

        Then why AG told follow court orders ? Does he also fool like us?

        We already spoke to advocates of 1998,99 batch, 2011 we have merits in our case, we are just waiting for right time.

        Court will decides who is right or wrong OK. Good luck.

        Reply
  9. @xmp Good one sir.
    Some guys who are scared about scoring less than xmp candidates, and woman quota( 5 and 128 right? ?)
    They dont even know why xmp is provided . Xmp guys fought for our country and wasted his youth. They have a right to claim tham reservation if he is capable of scoring more than GM candidate..

    Reply
    • That’s why they have been given the age relaxation , attempt relaxation and XMP quota … What more do u want steel ..

      Elladukku nyaya ide ..

      Think of that GM candidate who has lost mains by just one mark or two mark ….because of the increase in competition there is increase in cutoff …

      With all due respect to the army men here …. This is also about border cutoff

      Reply
        • For GM it’s inability. And for reservation it becomes only availability. Idiotic logic dude. Now chill no matter how much u guys shout ur lungs out, if they go back to old rules aftr d judgement, it’s contempt of court. If they do follow the reservation guys who die goes to court… Either ways enjoy d journey. It’s fun ride

          Reply
        • Why can’t kpsc follow upsc??
          If some one aged 40 years+ clears prelims in category, then how much right getting seat in GM in final list?

          Ex GM age limit -35 iddaga it’s not injustice to GM aspirants.

          Note- here GM including SC.st,Inc who scored more than GM cut off belongs to gM only

          Reply
        • Lo steel …GM Inability alla nim duraase
          Next time paapa SC/ST reservation politics Anta yavanadru kugadudno … Nin hypocrisy na nenskoli

          GM Andre ond community alla every meritorious reserved candidate includes here .

          Reply
  10. @Chombu..are you not confident of scoring more marks in MAINS than a XMP candidate (who passed pre with 6 marks)…?????what a confidence or fear or phobia????if you score less than him…then decide yourself…who deserves to be in final list..BEST WISHES to score more than XMP…

    Reply
    • @xmp are you scared of new rules? i think u have cleared prelims under category …are you not cpnfident of your category score ??..reach for gm then you will understan
      if you have scored less than xmp in prelims …and chombu is or wiil b confident of clrearing heighest in mains?? y xmp u have lost confidence?, i wish you best of luck for concernd category and final list in xmp only.bcoz u mst have cleared prelims in xmp category….sad

      Reply
      • Xmp category also have sub reservation..those who cleared in Gxmp which cut was 67.5 in prilims..guys those GM , don’t worry about ur seats we will compete only in Gxmp quota..if those who r thinking that their score will b less then Gxmp just forget about kAS..

        Reply
  11. Kumar , blue sky , man of trust are biggest fools I have seen in this forum . Man of trust is more interested in giving unauthentic and fake information , kumar is useless as dustbin . I don’t think they have even written mains . Go and get a life idiots .

    Reply
    • Neenu en dabbakidya antha illi bandidya ….kakkas thotti like irownu advice maadthowne nodro ….prelims pass aagilla neenu antha gottappa adikke than kedskotha illa neenu any reservation ..but frustrated aagidya nodu neenu prelims pass aagilla antha adanna kadime maadko guru …!!kachgicch bitya final list select agowrna aamele!!

      Reply
  12. Please refer to the below draft and share it with as many media houses as possible :

    Currently there have been discussions going rounds regarding reservation procedure followed by KPSC in its recruitment. The direction by the government to KPSC instructing it to follow 2016
    HC order in current selection evoked a strong protest with Minister Priyank Kharge shooting a Letter to the Chief Minister H. D. Kumaraswamy to revert to status quo. To understand the issue
    one needs to be clear about how KPSC conducts Gazetted Probationers (GP) exam and the procedure it adopts in reservation.

    Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) conducts Gazetted Probationers (GP) exam to recruit candidates for various public services under Government of Karnataka. It is held in three
    stages viz. Preliminary, Mains (Written Exam) and Interview. Candidates are expected to be Screened at each stage with due regard to their category claimed for reservation.
    In (M.R Balaji and Ors v. State of Mysore 1963, AIR 649) Supreme Court prescribed 50% cap on reservations for socially and educationally backward categories.

    The Government of Karnataka provides reservation in public employment as below: SC-15%, ST-3%, CAT I – 4%, II
    A – 15%, II B – 4%, III A – 4% and III B – 5%. The rest 50% is recruited through open merit.

    Only when a reserved category candidate scores enough marks to clear to general merit cut off at Every stage of exam can he/she be considered as general category candidate. In (Deepa EV v. Union of India) 2017 case Supreme Court mentioned ‘there is an express bar for the candidates belonging to SC/ST/OBC who have availed relaxation for being considered for General Category
    candidates.’ So far KPSC considered candidates clearing preliminary stage in reserved category with relaxed cut off marks to be general category candidates at Mains (written) exam.

    This migration from reserved list to general category list diminishes the classification between general merit candidate and reserved category candidate. This is despite the latter scoring low marks and
    having screened in at preliminary stage with relaxed cut off marks vis-à-vis general merit Candidate.

    The current KPSC procedure violates the 50% cap in reservation set by Supreme Court and is in Stark contrast with procedure prescribed by courts and government orders. For instance the
    Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) in 2015 All India Civil Services Exam considered the Topper (All India Rank 1) to be SC category and Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT)
    in the IAS list placed the topper in SC category despite scoring AIR 1.

    This is because the topper had cleared the preliminary stage in SC category (reserved) at relaxed cut off. Had UPSC been
    following KPSC quota norms then topper would have been considered at general merit Candidate.

    In a 2016 order the High court of Karnataka mentioned the procedure followed by KPSC in Admitting candidates to written exam and the list of candidates called for interview to be flawed and unconstitutional in 1998, 1999 and 2004. Accordingly it asked for revision and
    prescribed a procedure for segregation for these batches. However for GP exams conducted in 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2014 KPSC followed earlier flawed procedure and their final results have
    been announced.

    As this judgment came during the progress of 2015 GP Exam, KPSC sought clarification from Government of Karnataka for the procedure to be adopted in current selection. The state Government directed KPSC to abide by the HC order and follow the extant Government
    reservation rules.

    However due to politicization of the issue and the misreading of the judgment, the government has been forced to maintain status quo and thereby follow the flawed procedure again. The HC
    judgment comes as an opportunity to correct the flaws and should be seen in right spirit envisaged by Constitution of India. It is high time for KPSC to follow the correct procedure to avoid litigations in future as the current procedure it follows will not stand legal scrutiny in court of law.

    Reply
      • en criteria prelims hah? rules change adre hang adre matra you can balance 50 50 i have isssue same like scoring 6 in prelims and eyeing on gm in mains channag bardbittu olle score madidre nam gm seat kithkotare bari 6 or 128 prelims li score madi
        they have to chnage to help everyone
        but illi reserved unreserved and maritorious reserved li clarity beku
        maintaining 2 list clarity beku
        amele prelims level li 2 lists create madidaro ilwo clarity beku
        bcoz every level ond ond policy follow madidre whats the point?
        prelims criteria like tina dabi case bagge clarity beku .
        idella admele list bidbeku devare inna 2years navella taglakondwa??

        Reply
    • Have sent a mail to Hindu , prajavani .

      I have done my bit , come on guys it’s now or never .
      It’s not only about kas but also FDA,SDA and all the exams where GM candidates are forced to leave because of this flawed policy .

      Reply
  13. Yes.. Even they haven’t made that document public.. they did manipulate everything. Our medias have their IQ less than the room temperature. nothing would quench their insatiable greed.. Live and let live..

    Reply
  14. This is not gonna end here … It’s just a beginning

    We are all seeing how the facts are bring twisted and being projected in the media …. No body can stop a merit candidate from entering into GM quota ….Kumar judgement is not at all related to this ..

    Issue is how a GM candidate is made to fight for his quota again with reserved candidate even after the screening stage … This is ridiculous

    Just because a candidate scores top marks in mains ,should he be given GM quota ….let me tell u there are just 37 posts being allocated to pure GM out if 428 i.e not even 10 percent …

    When a physically handicapped candidate , when a XMP candidate , when a woman candidate get there place in GM quota even after passing stage in prelims …. Where is the place for GM candidates …

    90 percent of the candidates fighting for 10 percent space even after having utilized their quota ….

    This injustice being meted out to GM candidates should be fought
    Or else people like RYAN and manyothers who were otherwise meritorious had to loose out just because if this bloody dual reservation policy ….

    Firstly Kumar judgement na Tina Dhabi case alla Andru … Next Kumar judgement na follow madbardu Andru …

    Ega government madyirade sari illa antidare … No legislation can justify this policy … Those of you who think we can get away like this

    These candidates are nothing but hypocrites …

    *****”****
    GM and all the meritorious reserved candidates, brace yourself . We shall fight against this …..

    Reply
    • Copyrights cliam yavag aktare helu product release agbekadre .
      ange nam case Alli provisional list announce agli …. Minded attend Mari habba

      Reply
    • Vijay/MSD avre..
      meritorious students who ever they are if they get more marks than a GM candidate he should be put in unreserved list. so that other candidates from reserved category Should get opportunity.

      Reply
      • Yajamanre … Merit e Ella agidre age limit , attpts limits anta
        irtane irlilla .there is a limit to reservation also

        Be it upsc kpsc SSC . Reservation standard should adhered to

        Reply
    • en criteria prelims hah? rules change adre hang adre matra you can balance 50 50 i have isssue same like scoring 6 in prelims and eyeing on gm in mains channag bardbittu olle score madidre nam gm seat kithkotare bari 6 or 128 prelims li score madi
      they have to chnage to help everyone
      but illi reserved unreserved and maritorious reserved li clarity beku
      maintaining 2 list clarity beku
      amele prelims level li 2 lists create madidaro ilwo clarity beku
      bcoz every level ond ond policy follow madidre whats the point?
      prelims criteria like tina dabi case bagge clarity beku .
      idella admele list bidbeku devare inna 2years navella taglakondwa??

      Reply
  15. Am telling u again Bluesky is none other than Manoj …he s just creating fake news ..result date not yet finalised …..upto u ppl to believe whom ever u want ..but later don’t get frustrated wen it’s proved false!

    Reply
  16. “ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಆಧಾರದ ಮೇಲೆ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಹುದ್ದೆ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ” Is this real? what kind of judgement is this?
    how are they going to serve social justice by implementing this?

    Reply
  17. If govt follows old reservation rules by kept aside SC judgement and AG feed back, it will become Contempt of court.

    2015 GP notification date -12/5/2017
    Hc judgement date – 21/06/2016

    So kpsc can’t say and escape from court by saying we already notified we can implement from next notification.

    If some one goes to court, then it will be never ending issue like 1998,99 batch.

    Govt should listen to AG words by keeping aside their political agenda or unless we aspirants will suffer

    Reply
        • +100

          I am writing a letter to all the news papers about the issue … Some one who is good in Kannada please write a letter to prajavani … First make them understand about what the real issue … Their understanding is purely shit ….

          Does not matter if this notification gets quashed but this justice should be served .

          Physically handicapped candidate gets 4 hours to each write mains paper and he gets his place in GM quota .. XMP candidate who is 45 years old gets his place in GM quota …

          Munda mochtu we reservation system ge … 37 seats alli namgenide Mannu …. It’s not only about SC st obc … But about all of them …

          Reply
          • hanhadre meritorious reserved candifate ge value ilwa? thu i wud hav not applied under 3a ..now only 3 posts for me?.. despite scoring good marks?
            they wud have told us about the reservation policy in notifcation itself likr notifction contsins helps every detail this wat even cm said in cabinet meeting as well
            i get only 3 posts wid 3a certificate apply but never utilised 3a in prelims stage and hopeful in mains stage also
            had i not attached 3a certifcate i wud jave got 37 posts..now only 3?

          • Guru puneeth u have 37+3 seat to fight now ….. Even after the changes in reservation policy you will have the same luxury to do so ..

            But with no changes in this policy , everyone is behind those 37 seats i.e all 8000 of them who have written mains … That’s heights of misusing reservation isn’t it ….

            GM woman who passed prelims with 126 marks
            XMP who passed with 6 marks
            SC/st who passed prelims with 100+ marks

            They are behind your share .

            What is this called as ,?

            *****Kannada falling kitkondu tinnadu Antare….

          • chombu hangadre en criteria prelims hah? rules change adre hang adre matra you can balance 50 50 i have isssue same like scoring 6 in prelims and eyeing on gm in mains channag bardbittu olle score madidre nam gm seat kithkotare bari 6 or 128 prelims li score madi
            they have to chnage to help everyone
            but illi reserved unreserved and maritorious reserved li clarity beku
            maintaining 2 list clarity beku
            amele prelims level li 2 lists create madidaro ilwo beku
            bcoz every level ond ond policy follow madidre whars the point?
            prelims criteria like tina dabi case bagge clarity beku .
            idella admele list bidbeku devare inna 2years navell ataglakondwa??

        • True. Once some concrete document comes out like a direction to KPSC to follow the old policy or a law made in the legislature, then it can be questioned in the court..

          Reply
    • SC/ST, ಒಬಿಸಿಗೆ ಜನರಲ್ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಅವಕಾಶ ಇಲ್ಲ: ಇಂದು ಮಹತ್ವದ ಸಭೆ, ವಾಗ್ವಾದ ನಿರೀಕ್ಷೆ
      Vijaya Karnataka | Updated Nov 19, 2018, 08:15 AM IST
      ಮೀಸಲು ಅವಕಾಶವಿರುವ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಇದ್ದರೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ.
      ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು: ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯ ಪಡೆಯುವ ಎಸ್ಸಿ, ಎಸ್‌ಟಿ ಹಾಗೂ ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳು ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಆಧಾರದ ಮೇಲೆ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಹುದ್ದೆ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂಬ ಹೊಸ ಮಾನದಂಡ ಮೈತ್ರಿ ಸರಕಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಮತ್ತೊಂದು ಗೊಂದಲ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿದ್ದು, ಈ ವಿವಾದ ಸೋಮವಾರ ನಡೆಯಲಿರುವ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳ ಮಧ್ಯೆ ವಾಗ್ವಾದಕ್ಕೆ ಕಾರಣವಾಗುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ.

      ಮೀಸಲು ಅವಕಾಶವಿರುವ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಇದ್ದರೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ. ಮೀಸಲು ಹಾಗೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಪ್ರತ್ಯೇಕವಾಗಿ ಸಿದ್ಧಪಡಿಸಬೇಕು ಎಂದು ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿಗೆ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಸರಕಾರ ನೀಡಿರುವ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ವಿವಾದ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿದೆ. ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಆಧರಿಸಿ ಅಡ್ವೊಕೇಟ್‌ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಸಲಹೆಯಂತೆ ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿಗೆ ಈ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ನೀಡಲಾಗಿದೆ ಎಂಬುದು ಮುಖ್ಯ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ಸಮಜಾಯಿಷಿ. ಆದರೆ, ಈ ಕ್ರಮಕ್ಕೆ ಸಮಾಜ ಕಲ್ಯಾಣ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ, ಹಿಂದುಳಿದ ವರ್ಗಗಳ ಸಚಿವ ಪುಟ್ಟರಂಗಶೆಟ್ಟಿ ಸೇರಿ ಕೆಲವು ಸಚಿವರು ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಸೋಮವಾರ ಮಧ್ಯಾಹ್ನ ನಡೆಯುತ್ತಿರುವ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ವಿವಾದ ಸದ್ದುಮಾಡುವ ನಿರೀಕ್ಷೆಯಿದೆ.

      ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಹಾಗೂ ಹಿಂದುಳಿದ ವರ್ಗಗಳ ಸಚಿವರು ಒಟ್ಟಾಗಿ ಈ ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಮುಗಿಬೀಳುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ. ಈ ಹಿಂದೆ ಬಡ್ತಿ ಮೀಸಲು ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ನೌಕರ ವರ್ಗದ ಹಿತಾಸಕ್ತಿಗಾಗಿ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಸಂಪುಟದಲ್ಲಿ ವಾಗ್ವಾದಕ್ಕಿಳಿದು ರಾಜೀನಾಮೆ ನೀಡುವ ಬೆದರಿಕೆ ಹಾಕಿದ್ದರು. ಇದೀಗ ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ಅರ್ಹರಾದವರು ಆಯಾ ಪ್ರವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲೇ ಹುದ್ದೆ ಪಡೆಯಬೇಕು ಎಂಬ ವಿವಾದಿತ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳ ಮಧ್ಯೆ ಮಾತಿನ ಚಕಮಕಿ ಎಡೆಮಾಡಿಕೊಡುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ. ಈ ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಸರಕಾರದ ನಿಲುವು ಏನಿರಲಿದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಸಿಎಂ ಎಚ್‌.ಡಿ.ಕುಮಾರಸ್ವಾಮಿ ಯಾವ ತೀರ್ಮಾನ ಕೈಗೊಳ್ಳಲಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಎಂಬುದು ಕುತೂಹಲಕ್ಕೆ ಎಡೆಮಾಡಿಕೊಟ್ಟಿದೆ.
      ಸಿಎಂ ನಿರ್ಧಾರದ ಕುತೂಹಲ

      1998, 1999 ಮತ್ತು 2004ರ ಸಾಲಿನ ಗೆಜೆಟೆಡ್‌ ಪ್ರೊಬೆಷನರಿ ಹುದ್ದೆಗಳ ನೇಮಕ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆ ಸಂಬಂಧ 2016ರ ಜೂನ್‌ 12 ರಂದು ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನೀಡಿದ ತೀರ್ಪಿನಲ್ಲಿ ”ಮೀಸಲಿಗೆ ಅರ್ಹರಿರುವ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಅವಕಾಶ ನೀಡುವುದು ಅಸಾಂವಿಧಾನಿಕ. ಸರಕಾರದ ಆದೇಶಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ನಿಯಮಗಳಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವಾಗಿದೆ,” ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಿತ್ತು. ಈ ತೀರ್ಪನ್ನು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ಕೂಡ ಎತ್ತಿಹಿಡಿದಿತ್ತು. ಈ ಹಿನ್ನೆಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ 2015ನೇ ಸಾಲಿನ ಗೆಜೆಟೆಡ್‌ ಪ್ರೊಬೆಷನರ್ಸ್‌ ಹುದ್ದೆಗಳ ನೇಮಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಪಾಲಿಸುವ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಸರಕಾರದ ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ ಕೇಳಿತ್ತು. ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ಆರ್‌.ಆರ್‌.ಜನ್ನು ಅ.20 ರಂದು ಈ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದರು. ಪತ್ರಕ್ಕೆ ಸರಕಾರ ನ.3 ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ ನೀಡಿ, ಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ತೀರ್ಪು ಪಾಲನೆ ಮಾಡಲು ಸೂಚಿಸಿತ್ತು.

      ಸರಕಾರದ ಈ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನದ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಸಮಾಜ ಕಲ್ಯಾಣ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದರು. ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ಅರ್ಹರಾದ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಮೇಲೆ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಪ್ರವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲೂ ಸಿಗುವ ಅವಕಾಶ ಕಸಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಈ ತೀರ್ಮಾನ ಕೈಬಿಡುವಂತೆ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರು ಸಿಎಂಗೆ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದರು.
      ವಾಟ್ಸ್‌ಆ್ಯಪ್‌ನಲ್ಲೇ ಸುದ್ದಿಗಳನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ ಸಬ್‌ಸ್ಕ್ರೈಬ್‌
      Keywords:#ಸಮ್ಮಿಶ್ರ ಸರಕಾರ#ಮೀಸಲು ವಿವಾದ#SC ST#reservation dispute#OBC#coalition government

      Reply
    • SC/ST, ಒಬಿಸಿಗೆ ಜನರಲ್ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಅವಕಾಶ ಇಲ್ಲ: ಇಂದು ಮಹತ್ವದ ಸಭೆ, ವಾಗ್ವಾದ ನಿರೀಕ್ಷೆ
      Vijaya Karnataka | Updated Nov 19, 2018, 08:15 AM IST
      ಮೀಸಲು ಅವಕಾಶವಿರುವ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಇದ್ದರೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ.
      ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು: ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯ ಪಡೆಯುವ ಎಸ್ಸಿ, ಎಸ್‌ಟಿ ಹಾಗೂ ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳು ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಆಧಾರದ ಮೇಲೆ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಹುದ್ದೆ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂಬ ಹೊಸ ಮಾನದಂಡ ಮೈತ್ರಿ ಸರಕಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಮತ್ತೊಂದು ಗೊಂದಲ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿದ್ದು, ಈ ವಿವಾದ ಸೋಮವಾರ ನಡೆಯಲಿರುವ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳ ಮಧ್ಯೆ ವಾಗ್ವಾದಕ್ಕೆ ಕಾರಣವಾಗುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ.

      ಮೀಸಲು ಅವಕಾಶವಿರುವ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಇದ್ದರೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನ ಪಡೆಯುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ. ಮೀಸಲು ಹಾಗೂ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ವರ್ಗದ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಪ್ರತ್ಯೇಕವಾಗಿ ಸಿದ್ಧಪಡಿಸಬೇಕು ಎಂದು ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿಗೆ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಸರಕಾರ ನೀಡಿರುವ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ವಿವಾದ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿದೆ. ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಆಧರಿಸಿ ಅಡ್ವೊಕೇಟ್‌ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಸಲಹೆಯಂತೆ ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿಗೆ ಈ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ನೀಡಲಾಗಿದೆ ಎಂಬುದು ಮುಖ್ಯ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ಸಮಜಾಯಿಷಿ. ಆದರೆ, ಈ ಕ್ರಮಕ್ಕೆ ಸಮಾಜ ಕಲ್ಯಾಣ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ, ಹಿಂದುಳಿದ ವರ್ಗಗಳ ಸಚಿವ ಪುಟ್ಟರಂಗಶೆಟ್ಟಿ ಸೇರಿ ಕೆಲವು ಸಚಿವರು ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಸೋಮವಾರ ಮಧ್ಯಾಹ್ನ ನಡೆಯುತ್ತಿರುವ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ವಿವಾದ ಸದ್ದುಮಾಡುವ ನಿರೀಕ್ಷೆಯಿದೆ.

      ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಹಾಗೂ ಹಿಂದುಳಿದ ವರ್ಗಗಳ ಸಚಿವರು ಒಟ್ಟಾಗಿ ಈ ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಮುಗಿಬೀಳುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ. ಈ ಹಿಂದೆ ಬಡ್ತಿ ಮೀಸಲು ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ನೌಕರ ವರ್ಗದ ಹಿತಾಸಕ್ತಿಗಾಗಿ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಸಂಪುಟದಲ್ಲಿ ವಾಗ್ವಾದಕ್ಕಿಳಿದು ರಾಜೀನಾಮೆ ನೀಡುವ ಬೆದರಿಕೆ ಹಾಕಿದ್ದರು. ಇದೀಗ ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ಅರ್ಹರಾದವರು ಆಯಾ ಪ್ರವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲೇ ಹುದ್ದೆ ಪಡೆಯಬೇಕು ಎಂಬ ವಿವಾದಿತ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳ ಮಧ್ಯೆ ಮಾತಿನ ಚಕಮಕಿ ಎಡೆಮಾಡಿಕೊಡುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆಗಳಿವೆ. ಈ ವಿಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಸರಕಾರದ ನಿಲುವು ಏನಿರಲಿದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಸಿಎಂ ಎಚ್‌.ಡಿ.ಕುಮಾರಸ್ವಾಮಿ ಯಾವ ತೀರ್ಮಾನ ಕೈಗೊಳ್ಳಲಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಎಂಬುದು ಕುತೂಹಲಕ್ಕೆ ಎಡೆಮಾಡಿಕೊಟ್ಟಿದೆ.
      ಸಿಎಂ ನಿರ್ಧಾರದ ಕುತೂಹಲ

      1998, 1999 ಮತ್ತು 2004ರ ಸಾಲಿನ ಗೆಜೆಟೆಡ್‌ ಪ್ರೊಬೆಷನರಿ ಹುದ್ದೆಗಳ ನೇಮಕ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆ ಸಂಬಂಧ 2016ರ ಜೂನ್‌ 12 ರಂದು ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನೀಡಿದ ತೀರ್ಪಿನಲ್ಲಿ ”ಮೀಸಲಿಗೆ ಅರ್ಹರಿರುವ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಅವಕಾಶ ನೀಡುವುದು ಅಸಾಂವಿಧಾನಿಕ. ಸರಕಾರದ ಆದೇಶಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ನಿಯಮಗಳಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವಾಗಿದೆ,” ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಿತ್ತು. ಈ ತೀರ್ಪನ್ನು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ಕೂಡ ಎತ್ತಿಹಿಡಿದಿತ್ತು. ಈ ಹಿನ್ನೆಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ 2015ನೇ ಸಾಲಿನ ಗೆಜೆಟೆಡ್‌ ಪ್ರೊಬೆಷನರ್ಸ್‌ ಹುದ್ದೆಗಳ ನೇಮಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಪಾಲಿಸುವ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಸರಕಾರದ ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ ಕೇಳಿತ್ತು. ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ಆರ್‌.ಆರ್‌.ಜನ್ನು ಅ.20 ರಂದು ಈ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದರು. ಪತ್ರಕ್ಕೆ ಸರಕಾರ ನ.3 ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ ನೀಡಿ, ಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ತೀರ್ಪು ಪಾಲನೆ ಮಾಡಲು ಸೂಚಿಸಿತ್ತು.

      ಸರಕಾರದ ಈ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನದ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಸಮಾಜ ಕಲ್ಯಾಣ ಸಚಿವ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅಸಮಾಧಾನ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದರು. ಮೀಸಲು ಸೌಲಭ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ಅರ್ಹರಾದ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ, ಒಬಿಸಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೆರಿಟ್‌ ಮೇಲೆ ಜನರಲ್‌ ಪ್ರವರ್ಗದಲ್ಲೂ ಸಿಗುವ ಅವಕಾಶ ಕಸಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಈ ತೀರ್ಮಾನ ಕೈಬಿಡುವಂತೆ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್‌ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರು ಸಿಎಂಗೆ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದರು.
      ವಾಟ್ಸ್‌ಆ್ಯಪ್‌ನಲ್ಲೇ ಸುದ್ದಿಗಳನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ ಸಬ್‌ಸ್ಕ್ರೈಬ್‌
      Keywords:#ಸಮ್ಮಿಶ್ರ ಸರಕಾರ#ಮೀಸಲು ವಿವಾದ#SC ST#reservation dispute#OBC#coalition government

      Reply
  18. I am not able to believe what’s happening !! Even close aid of kpsc are providing me fake information .Results may be delayed at least till December 16th , I just shared the information that I got from them !! My sincere apologies if at all u think that I played with your emotions . Don’t want to update any of the info in this forum again !

    Reply
  19. this is the worst platform i have ever seen filled with cheap low classs 3rd rate species bad language abusive words horrible
    i wonder are they gonna be future civil servants who hardly have civic sense
    no use from this forum

    Reply
  20. @man of trust its tuesday morning i am waitin for your reaply
    u tol us that u ll b commntimn on tuesdat morning?
    where are you
    u also just escaoed liked bijoy geetha kaka and guru?
    plz dont do that ..if u have gebuine reason. if u share u not goin to looose anythin

    Reply
  21. @chetan only Tamil nadu passed reservation bill under 9th schedule, and yet to SC give final judgement reg this.

    Since Karnataka govt decided to follow old rules by ruling out AG feedback, SC decision it becomes contempt of court. So many Aspirants who will not see their name in mains qualify list/final list they will approach high court. Once again this batch will suffer like anything else.

    Reply
    • Regarding results it will take more time, bcoz they have to change rules or else of they follow old rules and announced results it will become contempt of Court.
      So what chetan saying about this is true. So there will be amendment.

      See today’s prajavni- cm quoted same

      Reply
      • SC judgement came in April 12th so.

        Kpsc should have sought opinion from Govt then itslef, but they were sleeping.

        ಗಡ್ಡಕ್ಕೆ ಬೆಂಕಿ ಹತ್ತಿದಾಗ ಬಾವಿ ತೊಡುವರು ಇವರು

        Reply
  22. Legislative action can bypass court judgment ..n n number of such cases have happened till date …n to maintain balance btw judiciary n legislature ,court generally doesn’t interfere in it ,if there s no violation of the Constitution …n there s no violation of Constitution coz Constitution itself provides that state can provide for reservation for the welfare of BC …n as far as reservation crossing 50% is concerned, most states provide for horizontal reservation n such laws r already placed under 9th schedule of Constitution !!Also recently even Parliament has tabled the bill to protect the interest of SC n ST ,to overturn the Supreme Court judgement ..so judiciary alone is not powerful ..there s enough measures in the Constitution to find balance btw three arms of the govt !

    Reply
      • @anil …see actually yest cabinet has not said to wait till legislative action …it has given time till December for the Chief Secretary to take back the order ..that’s all ..so though results date still not decided …since it’s a status quo ..I feel they will publish results n won’t wait till the legislative process …so kindly relax ..n also even if there s any judicial proceeding ,legislative n judiciary will sort it out …there s no point in we fighting here …nobody in the higher ranks bothers for this …so stay calm n conc on yo prep ..all the best

        Reply
  23. Finally the govt took decision in favour of larger section of aspirants.This is good move.even somebody knock the court door,a proper legislation may annul adverse court verdict.

    Reply
  24. So ..old reservation system ..ie Meritorious SC candidate can get into GM list at any stage whether or not I’ve cleared under reserved category in the previous stage …So to conclude ..govt has decided not to follow even Kumar judgement …n necessary legislative process will be furthered to ensure that even if someone challenges it in court ,it cannot be overturned !!

    Reply
    • Results this week…. decision was taken as SC shud get only in SC category n not gm…get ready guys results may come anytime in this week

      Reply
        • ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಲೋಕಸೇವಾ ಆಯೋಗ ನೇಮಕಾತಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಜಾತಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಪಂಗಡದ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಇದುವರೆವಿಗೂ ಅನುಸರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ನೇಮಕಾತಿ ನಿಯಮಗಳನ್ನೇ ಮುಂದುವರೆಸಲು ಅಗತ್ಯ ಕಾನೂನು ರೂಪಿಸಲು ಇಂದಿನ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆ ನಿರ್ಧರಿಸಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಗ್ರಾಮೀಣಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪಂಚಾಯತ್ ರಾಜ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಕಾನೂನು ಮತ್ತು ಸಂಸದೀಯ ವ್ಯವಹಾರಗಳ ಸಚಿವ ಶ್ರೀ ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಬೈರೇಗೌಡ ಅವರು ತಿಳಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

          Reply
      • Bari olu Bari olu !!! Fake news guys …don’t believe ..this s a frustrated soul !!..decision in yest cabinet meeting was taken on continuing the old system of reservation whr in migration in possible (SC can get post in merit )!

        Reply
        • Decision not taken yet…don’t worry…rules will change…court can interpret any rules/law and their verdict can’t be bypassed by govt…. otherwise 2011 scenario repeats ….it’s common sense…..

          Reply
          • For your common sense and revising yo polity basics … Legislative action can bypass court judgment ..n n number of such have happened till date …n to maintain balance btw judiciary n legislature ,court generally doesn’t interfere in it ,if there s no violation of the Constitution …n there s no violation of Constitution coz Constitution itself provides that state can provide for reservation for the welfare of BC …n as far as reservation crossing 50% is concerned, most states provide for horizontal reservation n such laws r already placed under 9th schedule of Constitution !!

          • Law minister himself has given a press note on it ..check ..just to satisfy ur needs ,don’t misguide ppl here …n ur going to be future bureaucrat ..ho by facts ,not intuisions !!all the best bro ..upto u to understand n believe !!

  25. • ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಲೋಕಸೇವಾ ಆಯೋಗ ನೇಮಕಾತಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಜಾತಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಪಂಗಡದ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಇದುವರೆವಿಗೂ ಅನುಸರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ನೇಮಕಾತಿ ನಿಯಮಗಳನ್ನೇ ಮುಂದುವರೆಸಲು ಅಗತ್ಯ ಕಾನೂನು ರೂಪಿಸಲು ಇಂದಿನ ಸಚಿವ ಸಂಪುಟ ಸಭೆ ನಿರ್ಧರಿಸಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಗ್ರಾಮೀಣಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪಂಚಾಯತ್ ರಾಜ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಕಾನೂನು ಮತ್ತು ಸಂಸದೀಯ ವ್ಯವಹಾರಗಳ ಸಚಿವ ಶ್ರೀ ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಬೈರೇಗೌಡ ಅವರು ತಿಳಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

    Reply
  26. Why So much confusion. Please go through the judgement properly.
    Two lists need to be prepared. One with everyone. Another with reserved category people.
    In first list there will be everyone, from both GM n also category.
    For example 2000 ppl have to be selected means, 1000 will be from 1st list. So it includes ppl from both GM n category.
    Rest 1000 from 2 list with reserved category ppl.
    So basically category ppl also can claim GM seats for mains if their score is high.
    Again it says meritorious reserved category ppl can claim GM seats also. Means you score more marks u can get posts in GM in final list irrespective of what list u were previously.
    Whether each level is connected or separate not sure.
    But its not like tina dabi case. Thats for sure.

    Reply
  27. File is with CM, how can commission decide about results dates?

    No one knows weather kpsc follows old rules or new rules, then how come you guys spreading fake news. Let govt clear it’s stand dirt until then stop your hyproctical theories and fake news.

    Cc-Fake news peddlers

    Reply
  28. meritorious reserved category antha ilwa?

    u mean see there are 4 posts of 3a
    . mains list li only 20 3a people irthara? …only?….
    thu i wud hav not applied under category had i knew this b4

    Reply
  29. as per as our karnataka is concerned.. they are like unupdated versions of softwares.. they do work as per their ANCIENT perception.. even if a rule is changed they wont care until it goes to court. till then they will follow their 5th standard abcd book only..

    Reply
  30. Gist of kumar judgment case.
    Kpsc should maintain 2 list I.e meritorious and reserved list in the ratio 50:50 in prelims and interview stage. No migration possible during this state.

    In final list you guys will get posts on your merit base. SC, St,obc can also get GM posts if they have scored well.

    Each stage I.e prelims,mains, is different no need of comparison here.

    TINA DAbi case and Kumar judgement case compare maadodikke agalla.

    Tina dabi case Alli prelims category Alli clear maadidre you will be in category in final list too.

    But in Kumar judgement case list list maintain maadodu prelims mains Alli mantra, not in final list.
    Ex. Much prelims Na category also clear maadidre, mains allu nivu category list Alli irtira, but after interview based on marks they will prepare one list, so nimma marks chenngiddre you will get post in GM, irrespective of category you cleared in prelims..

    Reply
  31. yodha sir independent r not??
    u not sure???
    bcoz i blong to sc category bt hav cleared in prelims in general merit category so i am eligible for both sc and gm corerrect alwa?

    Reply
    • Sir Anta Ella karibesi Mahesh … I am just an aspirant like you

      Coming to the judgement its not explicitly mentioned in final order whether each stage should be considered independent or dependent so such interpretations ….

      According to my understanding you are now a meritorious reserved candidate and you stand a chance to be placed in unreserved list if you have the merit in mains stage and if not you ll be entitled to claim the reservation under SC quota ….

      Even I belong to 3a but I have passed the prelims stage in GM quota ,accordingly I should be eligible to claim in both the lists ….

      Reply
      • @yodha.ಅಣ್ಣಯ್ಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ judgement ಓದಪ್ಪ. ಯಾಕೆ ಸುಮ್ನೆ ಏನೇನೋ ಹೇಳ್ತಿದೀಯ.
        ನೀನು ಟೀನಾ ಡಾಬಿ case ಹೇಳ್ತಿದೀಯ ಅನ್ನಿಸುತ್ತೆ. ಕುಮಾರ್ judgement ಒಂದೇ ಒಂದು ಸಲ ಓದಿಬಿಡು.

        Reply
  32. In today’s cabinet meeting they may discuss GPE issue kindly do TWEET by tagging CM, CS, office of CS, KpSC, controller, etc

    We have to put pressure on them Urge for result announcement soon or else it will never come in this year,

    Reply
  33. This Yodha doesn’t even know how horizontal reservation works.GMK 184 cut off is bizarre for him.He scolds all other people.Yodha should be ready to take shots on the day of results when he gets to know that he was completely wrong.

    Reply
    • Haven’t scolded anybody here …. I have kept my opinions to myself and those who concur with it … Stop blabbering for the sake of it ….

      Point of the debate is :

      Each stage is dependent or not …. That’s the million dollar question here … Answer with proof

      Reply
      • yodha sir independent r not??
        u not sure???
        bcoz i blong to sc category bt hav cleared in prelims in general merit category so i am eligible for both sc and gm corerrect alwa?

        Reply
  34. Without knowing rules and clarity how they can callform for exam and all. It should be done before conducting exam and before leaving notification simply studying without getting results and not knowing recruitment procedures. They should be clear about rules before notification. What is this hopeless kind of procedure after exam they are deciding about requrtment rules.

    Reply
  35. ಯಾವನೋ ಇವನು ಯೋಧ ಇವನು…. ಏನೇನೋ ಹೇಳಬೇಡ. ನೀನು challenging ಸ್ಟಾರ್ ದರ್ಶನ್ ಅನ್ಕೊಂಡಿದಿಯ??? ಗ್ರೂಪ್ನ
    Musuguide ಮಾಡಬೇಡ. ಕುಮಾರ್ judgement ಓದು.

    Reply
    • Lo admin nan odirodakke heltirodu … Misguide ante … Who am I to misguide the group …. I am only talking to those who are asking my opinion , I am not imposing my views on anyone …..

      Nan helo vishaya Ning ishtaglilla Andre ignore madu minded kelsa nodu …. Nija na helakke Yaar fan agbekagilla

      Reply
    • @ mollad admin

      Nin odidiya guru judgement na ,? Artayta

      Arta agilla Anta kanutte . Yodha is very much right , not misguiding anybody here .

      Btw yav category Alli prelims pass agidiya

      Reply
  36. All the political leaders are speaking without brain,without legal advice..where as Yodha is the only brainy person who is brainy enough to interpret the law perfectly… Priyank Kharges lawyer,HC Mahadevappas advocate,HM Revannas legal advisor are all wastes.. Yodha is perfect.. 🙂

    Reply
    • Bhanu …. I cud sense the sarcsam … you think All these so called backward class leaders are really interested in ur cause … And you even think they take legal opinion before they speak …. That shows how well versed with Indian politics ….

      Reply
  37. this is so confusing.. they shd revamp reservation.. KM cutoff was highest among all.. given they may also come under GM.. so now those few ‘somes’ can only get seat under “KM” seats not for “GM” seats in “mains” ? Who is gonna correct this discrepancy?

    Reply
    • That’s right …. Their policy is completely flawed ….
      We need to point this out , all these years so many aspirants have been at the recieving end who otherwise we’re very much eligible to get the rank ….. Again nice observation ??

      Reply
        • GM kannada medium candidate had to get 184 to make it to the mains where in pure GM cut off was 183 … So GM Kan candidate even after getting more than GM cutoff will be placed in GM kannada …. Subsequently his name will be in the reserved list under Kannada medium category where the number of seats he can fight for are comparatively less in comparison to number of seats in the open quota i.e pure GM ….. this is kind of discrepancy which JJ is talking about

          Reply
      • and if one has multiple reservation like gmk and gmw then in which they will alloted the seat. assume that candidate cleared prelims in both categories.

        Reply
      • ಯಾವನೋ ಇವನು ಯೋಧ ಇವನು…. ಏನೇನೋ ಹೇಳಬೇಡ. ನೀನು challenging ಸ್ಟಾರ್ ದರ್ಶನ್ ಅನ್ಕೊಂಡಿದಿಯ??? ಗ್ರೂಪ್ನ
        Musuguide ಮಾಡಬೇಡ. ಕುಮಾರ್ judgement ಓದು.

        Reply
    • Adana horizontal reservation antha karithare when there are various sub quotas in gm first a candidate who has applied in various sub quotas such as gm rural and Kannada they should be shortlisted there first and then gm unreserved . Various parties had approached Supreme Court in states such as uttarkhand , Gujarat etc seeking clarification regarding this what kpsc following is according to rules prescribed by Supreme Court itself ( regarding horizontal reservation )

      Reply
    • There isn’t any flaw to what you claim, horizontal reservation is followed with due diligence & the objectives for which it has been introduced to have opportunity for the specific sections else you are creating reservation within reservation which should not be the case.

      Reply
      • Yes adana various court judgments of Supreme Court has said they can check it online specifically with respect to uttarkhand

        Reply
          • this Discussion is not regarding two seperate lists or anything this is regarding why gm kannada cut off is more than gm unreserved ie because they follow the guidelines given by Supreme Court regarding horizontal reservation

  38. Today’s prajavani Swamiji also entered through Pg 5,RT end col. We, aspirants already in trouble without results,there is political will in favour of result announcement.There is no aashirvadams of so called spiritualists( Swamiji s.what a pity state of upcoming civil servants. We have 2 help ourselves. Two days before news of (letter to cm by pl) appeared in today’s Hindu. Best of luck.

    Reply
  39. Reservation file is with CM, CS submitted file to CM, read todays Kannada prabha.

    Tomorrow there is cabinet meeting, since so many Congress legislators and minister wrote a letter to cm, they may discuss tomorrow and take final decision about reservation issue.

    If reservation issue sorted out in tomorrow’s meeting then we may expect result within a week or else it will drag like anything else.

    If Congress wants to discuss in winter session then forget about results.

    Reply
  40. Any recent devpts 2 announce d results. They must rise 2 d occasion at least now to announce d results.They must understand d plight of aspirants & their various issues.If they r unable to announce d results by this wk end, condition will be pathetic & as worse as gp 2011. Authentic info is d need of d hour. What 2 do now?

    Reply
  41. i think,the process delayed further,when it becomes political issue,obviously the govt succumb to political pressure and takes decision in favour of larger community(sc,st,obcs-85%).Even govt make new rules& withdrawing its previous direction(nov 3 order),the matter will not be settled out easily.it again knocking the court door &the process delayed further(no one predict the time limit). my suggestion is, the aspirants concentrate on upsc and other exams.because,many previous instances witness kpsc playing with aspirants lives.because an aspirants knows the hardships during his/her praparation.here no value for honesty,hard work,only money matters.

    Reply
  42. @Man of Trust .kindly don’t misguide aspirants ….no way results will be in November (according to my source in kpsc )..n moreover the second file which which is pending in DPAR coz the decision on 2015 gpe is yet to be sorted out by the cabinet committee !

    Reply
    • Yeah I agree with u …after 23rd Man_of_Trudt would do either of the things
      1.abscond permanently in this name n reappear with another name as he has done previously.
      OR
      2.come n say my info was true ,but since the reservation issue involved big politicans ,it got delayed !

      Reply
  43. When we gathered infront of kpsc, some kpsc staff revealed that results will be in jan/Feb end, by looking at the politicians writing letter to the CM, it looks their information will come true. Oh god?

    Sad sitiution of aspirants!!!!

    Reply
  44. ಓಲ್ಡ್ ರೂಲ್ಸ್ ಆದ್ರೂ ಫಾಲೋ ಮಾಡ್ರಿ ಅಥವಾ ನ್ಯೂ ರೂಲ್ಸ್ ಆದ್ರೂ ಫಾಲೋ ಮಾಡಿ ಲಿಸ್ಟ್ ಬಿಟ್ಟು ನಮಗೆ ಮುಕ್ತಿ ಕೊಡರೋ, ಎಷ್ಟು ವರ್ಷ ನಮ್ಮ ಯೂವ್ವನ ಮತ್ತು ವಯಸ್ಸು kpsc ಗೆ ಮೀಸಲು ಇಡಬೇಕು, ತಲೆ ಕೂದಲು ಬಿಳಿ ಆದ್ರೆ ಕೆಲವರಿಗೆ ಕೆಲವರು ಬಂಡ್ಲಿ ಆಗವರೇ, ನಿನ್ನೆ ಮೊನ್ನೆ ಚೆಡ್ಡಿ ಹಾಕೋದೆ ನಮ್ಮ ಕಣ್ಣ ಮುಂದೆ ಓಡಿಡ್ತಿದ್ದ ಹುಡುಗರು ಇಂದು ಬೈಕ್ನಗೆ ಹುಡುಗಿಯರು ಕುರ್ಸ್ಕೊಂಡು ಹೋಗ್ತವರೆ ಟಾಟಾ uncleuu ಅಂಥ ನಮಗೆ ಹೇಳಿ ಹೋಗತವರೆ, ನಾವು ನೋಡಿದ್ರೆ ಅರ್ಜುನ ಸನ್ಯಾಸಿ ತರಹ ಬದುಕ್ತಿದ್ವಿ.. ಒಂದು ನೆಂಟರ ಫ್ರೆಂಡ್ಸ್ ಮನೆಗೆ ಹೋಗಕ್ಕೆ ಮುಖ ಇಟ್ಟುಕೊಂಡು ಹೋಗೊಕ್ಕೆ ಅಗೋಲರ್ಡ್,

    ಇನ್ನೂ ಮದುವೆ ಮನೆಗೆ ಹೋದ್ರೆ ಕತೆ ಮುಗಿತು ಇನ್ನೂ ಯಾಕೆ ಮದುವೆ ಆಗಿಲ್ಲ ಏನಾದ್ರು problem check ಮಾಡ್ಸ್ ಡಾಕ್ಟರ್ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಅಂಥ ಅಜ್ಜಿಯರು ಬಿಟ್ಟಿ ಸಲಹೆ ಬೇರೆ ಕೊಡುತ್ತಾರೆ

    ಯಾರಿಗೆ ಹೇಳೋಣ ನಮ್ಮ ಪ್ರಾಬ್ಲೆಮು????????

    Reply
    • If it s a legislative action …then there s not much scope for judicial intervention ..coz states have the mandate to make rules…n it wud not b in contravention with any parliamentary or constitutional mandate

      Reply
  45. The truth which can be guranteed to happen is ..there will be no change in reservation policy !!n definitely no results in November !!!200%……I challenge if this s not going to happen ????

    Reply
  46. Politicians are not understood the judgement, they want publicity.

    SC,st,obc are eligible to get posts in GM too if they have cleared exam in GM/merit quota. Don’t believe in such political comments it’s delay tactics.

    Now each and every Congress backward leaders writing letter to Cm, so they want to discuss in cabinet meeting /coordination committee, now it’s tug of war between both the political parties, si don’t expect results before January..

    Reply
    • @justice league the new rule is not as Tina Dabi case as u r predicting.. the govt ordered to follow high court order according g to which there has to b two diff lists …. GM list and reserved list in the ratio of 50:50. ..while preparing interview list. And in final list after interview it will b according to merit. means even if a SC candidate is topper he wl b selected in GM and so on. So no one will b at loss and remember according to this judgement even if a candidate clears prelims in reserved category and if he does well in mains and interview he can b put in GM. The judgement clearly mentioned that in prelims and mains as there is no minimum marks required, only 1: 20 and 1: 5 lists to be prepared so no need to prepare list as per the reservation seats available in notification. The only rule taken into consideration is GM 50 and reserved 50. Only during the preparation of final list after interview where according to reservation system candidates r selected. That’s it

      Reply
      • see in final list if a reservd candidadte can go to gm
        wherz your 50 : 50 ratio .its cant be maontained
        on what criteria you following here? prelims score?
        rembr its about meritorious resrvd candidadtes
        if such was d case i wud hav not applied under reservation
        whatz d point me scorin good marks n go out of the list.
        this sytmn is flawed aswell

        Reply
  47. so this reservation issue is not like dabi case .
    so prelilms score is not important ..
    it is about 2 lists and meritorious reserved candidates
    yodhs sir please answer

    Reply
    • @public prelims score is definitely a determinant here …. Each stage is dependent and someone uses the category once can never find his place in unreserved list …. This is what the judgement all about …..

      Even if a 3a candidate is scoring the highest marks in this recruitment , he is eligible for only 2 posts …..this is the harsh truth

      Reply
      • Some facts which are hard to digest gets you confused …. It’s the human nature ….

        Some dubious person makes an argument that each stage is independent and you deduce this as the judgement … This is called selective interpretation … All the best sister ….

        Reply
        • Dude be it wat ever the thing …I asked my source(close aid of one the members)in kpsc …they have told that
          1)result will definitely not be in November
          2)since the cabinet committee is going to decide on it there s a lot of pressure from many cabinet minsters to take back the Nov 3 order n mostly necessary legislative procedures will be taken to protect the interests of BC .
          Do leave this issue to the govt ,it will sort out ….dont fight here !?

          Reply
        • Yodha… U and ur senseless interpretations… U don’t know anything regarding this… Prelims score is not at all a determinant.. keep the false assumptions to yourself.. even after reading the judgement u r not able to interpret it.. if u believe prelims is determinant.. enjoy the myth.. please don’t create false hopes.. first of all people here are frustrated and people like u only worsen the situation..

          Reply
        • @yodha plz read the judgement clearly… Do u think politicians writing letter without knowing the fact? How idiotic u r… Why can’t u understand? Why u r mixing the issue with Tina dabi kind of case? Pls read N. Kumar judgement first.. page no 263 to 275.

          Reply
          • @ Ramu lo tagdu nin odu amele nangu band helu … HC mahadevappa en circus madtavma if there were no changes in the reservation …. Tina Dhabi case ante Kumar judgement ante … Nimmanta opportunistic candidates indane ivatt desha ingag kutiradu
            .. prelims passagakku quota mains clear madakku quota … General merit orenu gensu kilakka bandidare ….

            Give some bloody Respect to the merit students who have cleared in prelims ….stop back door migration happening in mains stage ….. That is how the ratio remains intact … this is the judgement … Idi arta madkolak agalla Andre tution of kutko

          • Simple politicians alla … Obba tagdu politician who is jobless crying for it …. Just like he is living in a fools paradise that reservation can be enjoyed for life time in every stage of life ….

            263-275 alla full document nin odu … Adru Ning artagalla because its against your wishes

  48. Because of this reservation issue, our result may get delayed further, it has become political issue.. When kpsc dysfunction no one come forward to speak up, but regarding reservation everybody will come to further delay the result

    Reply
  49. Many legislators and leaders of dalit community started protest against govt order regarding reservation policy. Hence government may withdraw it’s order soon..so its become political now.. KPSC on its own can’t take decisions…

    Reply
  50. Is there any geography optional aspirantwho gave mains in 2014 ..please if u have rti copy .kindly share ..because this is my 1st attempt in kpsc …I just heard ppl here get wonderful marks up to 400 ..so just want to see how they evaluate ..thanks a lot in advance …and please make use of this forum in a right way !

    Reply
  51. According to some print media reports secretary got feedback from November 3rd, but file movement is not updated on website.
    I don’t know why they are delaying results…

    Reply
    • Practically seems impossible ….n this Man _of _Trust s none other than Manoj …simply fooling ppl ..coz I had seen this super cm n proxy secretary comment under sum other name sonetime back to fool ppl …so no point in believing !

      Reply
  52. There are WhatsApp and telegram groups, if anyone is sure about results they’ll post it in those groups. Mollas has become Namratha’s( Manoj’s) dumpyard. That mentally retarded lady posts her questions and then answers with different username.
    Anonymous, ABC, Yoyo all are one and same.
    PS: Just come to this forum for enjoyment and to vent out your frustration but don’t take any comments seriously.

    PPS : Manoj nin job yen antha gottaitha nange.. What’s your hourly charge ?

    Reply
  53. By hook or crook,kpsc(proxy secretary cum chairman cum Super CM) is agressive this time to declare the results by the date i mentioned below .My next comment will be on tuesday morning,till then if at all u see any messages in my name,kindly ignore.thanks for all your blessings !! all the best for preparations

    Reply
  54. Scumbag like @anonymous should be thrown into the dustbin. Your very purpose of life is defeated now by making yourself a third class cheap graded person .

    Reply

Leave a Comment