KEA Panchayath Development Officer and Grama Panchayath Secretary conducted an exam recently and candidates are eagerly waiting for Karnataka PDO Result Cutoff.
Here we discuss everything related to PDO & GPS Result 2021 Expected Cut Off Score/Marks and Result Date. As you know we also provide information related to other examinations too. Therefore, we decided to produce the relevant content so the candidates can talk about.
There is comment section below on this page to discuss everything related the PDO GPS Recruitment, Result & Cut Off Marks. Your Comments will be published instantly as soon as you hit the submit button.
KEA PDO & GPS Result 2021 – Paper 1 & Paper 2 Cut Off
| Kea.kar.nic.in | Karnarak PDO Result, GPS Result, Paper 1 & paper 2 cut off score/marks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name | Karnataka PDO GPS Grade-1 2021 |
| Exam Authority | Karnataka Examination Authority/ RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA |
| Exam Date | Updated Soon |
| Result status | not announced yet. Cut Off Marks available below |
| Post Name | Panchayath Development Officer and Gram Panchayath Secretary |
| Website | www.kea.kar.nic.in |
As we know the examination gets completed without any hurdle. Hence, the candidates are looking for the Result of the examination. We would like to clear few points here. Each and Every Recruitment involves several steps. From Releasing notification to an online application, then verifying the validation an application to holding exam and more.
It takes time, to reach its ultimate goal of the releasing Joining letters after a lot of hassle and pain in the ass of the officials. Therefore, announcing the result in hurry is not a game of kids. Let’s discuss the remaining steps of this recruitment too.
Karnataka PDO Result
In next step after taking examination, the KEA board will release the PDO & GPS Answer Key. The candidates who took part in the examination will be asked to review the answer key and submit the objections if any.
To submit the objection for the correction of the answer key, one should the produce the documentary proof of the correct answer. If one fails to obey the norm, the answer will be considered correct and included in final answer key.
The result of any examination also gets prepared in terms of the final answer key.Therefore, it becomes more important to submit the objections.
Kar PDO GPS Cut Off Marks 2021 exam analysis
Here, we are providing the expected cut off score for Paper 1 and Paper 2 of the PDO and GPS examination Below.
As we know the examination was divided into 2 parts. The paper 1 included the multiple choice questions from General Knowledge, General Kannada, General English while paper 2 had questions from Rural Development and Panchayat Raj.
Each paper had 100 questions. Every correct answer will be awarded 2 marks. Hence, it makes 200 marks paper for each. As there is no Negative marking, it will affect the cutoff score.
Though, the cutoff marks depend on several factors. Few are the total number of applicants to the posts, the difficulty of the written test and more.
Here we will provide the expected cutoff score for both papers separately. You can check the table below for the Cut Off score Category Wise.
KEA PDO GPS Cut Off Score Paper 1
| Category | Score |
| General | 134-140 |
| OBC | 130-134 |
| SC/ST | 120-126 |
| ESM | 110-120 |
KEA PDO GPS Cut off Score Paper 2
| Category | Score |
| General | 120-124 |
| OBC | 116-118 |
| SC/ST | 110-112 |
| ESM | 100-104 |
Relevant Keyword searches for this exam are as follow
Karnataka PDO Result 2021, Karnataka GPS Result 2021, Kar PDO GPS Result, KEA PDO & GPS Cut Off Score, PDO Cut OFF, GPS Cut OFF
How to check the PDO & GPS Result 2021
- First of all, Visit the official website of KEA
- Then, . on PDO GPS Recruitment
- . on the detail of result then
- Enter your details and check result
ನೊಡ್ರಪ್ಪಾ ಸುಮನ್ನೆ ಗೊಂದಲಗಳಿಗೆ ಆಸ್ಪದ ಕೊಡಬೇಡಿ ಮತ್ತು ಬಹಳಷ್ಟು ಜನ ನಕಲಿ ಹೆಸರಿನಿಂದ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳನ್ನು[ಮಾರ್ಜಿನ್ ಅಕ್ಕಪಕ್ಕದಲ್ಲಿರುವವರನ್ನು] ಹುರಿದುಂಬಿಸುವ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ……. ಸುಮ್ಮನೇ ಇಂತವರ ಮಾತು ಕೇಳಿ ಕೊನೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರಾಸರಾಗಬೇಡಿ… ಈ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಯಾಕೆ ಹೇಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದೇನೆ ಎಂದರೆ ರಿರಿವೈಸ್ ಇದ್ದೇ ಇದೆ……
Andre ninu kooda ellarante gondalakkidmadtidiya antatu …….ninenu kea nalli work madtiroda ella gottiroke
Sumne iddbidu illa nikharavad mahiti idre aste share maadu …..
Le Vishwanatha yako Sandesh anoo hesru use madtaidya
Kea ge ega thane cal madidhe. . . Process li idhe e month end olage verification bidtharanthe. . Re revise agutha antha kelidhukke result bitmele antha revise madthare antha elidhru. . Objection ge time kottaga esht objection bandhidhe asht mathra consider madthranthe. . . . Ega Bittirodhe nim result Alli nodkali nimdhu agutha agalwa antha elidhru. . . . Nivu
Nodidhre revise madthare antha nange ase uttusthidhira. . . I missed pdo post by 2 month age. . . Ega grade 1 aguthe. . Nang bandhiro mahithi prakaar october nalli training schedule madtharanthe. . Sumne eneno elo age alla nimdhu . . Be serious plz. .otherwise u spoiled ur time and age. . . .
Tika mucchu October Ali reexam aste
@Ravindran list bidsakke neev yaru kea avru avra Kelsa madtare n list bidtare sumne phose kodbedi naane list bidside anta buildup tagolekke illi comment haktira time bandre yells aguthe
Sumne mado Kelsa bittu illi comment hakond banchat kayakava nambi baduki time pass madkand irbedi guldugala
yak hige bari sul heli bereyavrge tondre kodtidra astu vikruta mansa nimdu ondu tilkolli nav select agidivi pdo age agtivi nive nimma jeevanada amulyavad time na halmadkoltirodu .maklu kuda etara adalla doddavragi swalpanu gambirate bedva sul mahiti haktiralla olledagalla nimge e blog na pdo elect agdirorge bittu kodona select agiroru e blog nodbedi pls
Girisha Re exam madustia tane nan nin support bido maga.
I don’t know but those who are studied they are waiting for result.
ravindran nimagu thanks
vijaya ondu vele result bittdde nijavadre nine real hero
Hey girish loafer est janara bhavanegalha. Jothe aata aadthiddiya annodu gothirali, magane kelsa sigali bidli avra manassina novu ninna bidodilla.neenu yaru antha gothagbitre hudikondu bandu odothini….magane
Neenu ata adtairadu gaand Bashir..
Girish Loafer : one fine day I will trace you . Ftom now onwards Be careful
Bro send audio clip
9845225561
Vijay neen beggar
Estla neen marks
Neen Dodd Loafer
Bere avra vishaya ninge yake
Dear friends,
Mr girish beggar is using my name and commenting, Mr girsih if you have guts than put your contact number I will send you my voice clip , you are fit to be g_,__u
Sir audio clip send madi
@sidhu : sir, audio clip illa, they will announce in 1st week of August, plz wait, girish beggar is misguiding us, , that beggar is using my name and commenting,
9972051093
Nan audio kelde Adara prakara nododadre results Evttu Nale Bidtivi anta helidare thanks Vijay sir
Ravindran sir Bahala effort hakidare list bidodakke many many thanks sir nimge
Cases hagene nadita ertave navu Doc verification list bidteve andru
Selected candidates nim documents ready madkolli only 1 week time kottidare
All the best
kartik avare audio kalisi 9686453838
Sullu bari kage harsade aytu. Lo huccha nennu nange cl madi nan officer Tara mathadire adu 1 audio agutte
Guball Gala arta madkoli idu bari sullu suddi
Hey loafer neenu muchkondu iru magane address haku
Neen muckalo balls..
9972051093
gubalgala ellide result tooooooo
can u send audio….if I put my number?
Ya….I have met AO….they have said me to meet me on 19th evening…..since NEET counseling is going on till 19th….they said they are busy….
They said they are going to announce list shortly…. Don’t worry…
List yest Bega agutto ast bege announce madakke try madtini……
any body have an audio clip pls send my no 9686453838
Bari sullu yavano sumne bandu Kate heli Hoda aste. Result barutte nale adre yav nale anta gotilla aste!!
Elru manga madtidare sir don’t believe this
Hello vijay sir….
Pls send dat audio clip to dis number …..
9845225561
Yav Audio nu I’ll yenu Illa, illi yaru Nim display madbedi.
nijana evat result barodu??????? audio keldavru conform madi plssssssssssssssssss
nija evat result barodu audio keldavru conform madi plssssssssssssssssss
Pls send audio clips
9964559573
ಪ್ರಿಯ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳೆ. ಇವತ್ತು ರಿಸಲ್ಟ್ ಬರೋದು ನಿಜವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು, ಆದ್ರೆ ಕೇಸ್ ಕ್ಲೋಸ್ ಆದವು ಅಂತಾ ಮಾತ್ರ ಅನ್ಕೋಬೆಡಿ. ಆಲ್ ದಿ ಬೆಸ್ಟ್.
Lo Sandesh bari Sullu bidale avnobba punggi dasa aste. Don’t take him serious
Lol
Le Vishwanath Sandesh anta hesru Change madi msg haktia Kalla..
Sumne yakrappa , sullu mahiti kodabeku? Idarinda yen sigutte Nimage?
Vijay Ninobba Comedy piece tara yakadtidiya lo mangyan tandu
Correct agi helo yavtu result and
Case hege dismiss advu?
Vijay istotanka 2 tinglali 10 sala PDO results barsi . 9 times verification maskonddane this is his 10 time
Joker fello
Dhanyavadagalu Vijay sir
Nanu audio kelde
Nija results Evattu Ella Nale Results khandita bidteve antha helidare
Hurray Congrats Ella pdo selected akanshigalige
Lo girish elli Sat hogidiya
Enaitu nindu re exam enella bogale bitte
Bari elli pungi bajane yake madtiya
Lo huccha cll me I’ll spk like officer and send u an audio
Don’t believe itz just bari kage..harsadu
@ vijay
voice record send madi sir what’s up number hakidaralla
@vijay 9902338192 my whatsp number. plz..send that audio clip.
@Surya
Avnobba punggi dasa bido yak tali kedskotia
Loafer David
Evattu results barutte
Kea working day ede
Nimma beggar girish ge kelu
A tunne maganige kelu bekadre
Le huchappa muchho Bai bitmele mathodo.
Sumne illi Kate pungtia nav kivili flower itkondilla
Ninobba dodda bikari girish GE bucket hiditiya
Nan no ge cal madu
Face to face fight madona
Cases dismiss agidave nale paper news barutte
Navu ega elle edeve
Confirm news evattu bitre Nale result confirm
Lo joker madlu ivattu ande ivaga nalenu antaidya .
Yav nale Cort ag date helo
Nin NO kalse beggar bikari David
Aga confirm gottagutte
Joker yako sull heli tiko harkotia gubbal begger
hege bidsi heli sir case hege dismis agtave evat holiday Alva ? result heg barutte evattu sariyaga heli pls
@ kantri bikari girisha, : don’t use my name, if you have guts than use your dirty name and message
Sir nijana result ivattu bidodu?
Howdu cent % right
Document list 7 ghantge bidtare
Nanu kea AO ganghadharayya avra jote matadidene
Yarige audio beku nim no haki
1:3 ratio Anthe
Starting date 24
Be ready with the documents
howda sir nija
evat Sunday Alva ad hege evat list haktare sir nijana NIV heltirodu
@Vijay
Holu bari holu. Illi tanka tumba sala result barsbitidya saku muchho
hello send me an audio clip
9880740838 Plz Sent to this no Voice record
Sent already
Please
Audio kelida mele elli confirm madi
Today result barutte
hk sir audio kalisi pls 9686453838 navu keltivi
Chitradurga.gp1.seletion.for.Thippaiah. k400.226.Gatagare..s.t
@girish and super duper : I.know that both of you are same, one fine day I will trace out your location / number , shortly I will.meet you
@super duper Loafer : first nindu mathu nimma appa du chanagi muchko amele nundu muchu Bantu, beggar fellows
Le vijay luchha bousideke
Yadgiri station Alli ninu thika free agi hodskond irtiya
Sumne majestic ge ba
Olle collection agutte
Thika nindu duddu nange
Ninage uta vasati vyvyasthe free free free
!@auper beggar and gir8sh beggar, : take your families to majestic for doing such things, hudgi Tara message madubeda, call me we will meet face to face and fight
Le duplicate ಸಂದೇಶ. ನೀನು ನನ್ನ ಕೈಗೆ ಸಿಗು ,ಆಗ ಐತೆ ನಿನಗೆ . ಇಲ್ಲಿ ನಾನು ಕಾಯ್ದುಕೊಂಡು ಬಂದಿದ್ದ ಮಹತ್ವವನ್ನು ನೀನು ಮಣ್ಣು ಪಾಲು ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದಿಯ. ನನ್ನ ಫಾಲ್ಲೋರ್ಸ್ ಕೈಗೆ ಸಿಕ್ರೆ ನಿನ್ನ ಗತಿ ಏನಾಗುತ್ತದೆ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಯೋಚಿಸು. ಸುಮ್ಮನೆ ಏಕೆ ತಪ್ಪು ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಕೊಡುತ್ತಿಯ?
Esttu jana nin followers kanda sandhesha
Nim horata ellivarge bantu adu helu
Namdu tarkika antya ago vargu bido hagilla
ಯಾವ ಹೋರಾಟ
9141402744 add this no to pdo whatsup group
Le R randimagane ninantha avru namma samajakke maraka eno pugsotte salahe kodbeda
Nin kaili enadru kittokke adru list release madsko
Nodona nin expert committee hege final antha
Le R randimagane ninantha avru namma samajakke maraka eno pugsotte salahe kodbeda
Nin kaili enadru kittokke adru list release madsko
Nodona nin expert committee hege final antha
Sumne nin thika amonkond iru
Modlu sariyagi matadoke kalko ….innantavarindane samaja halagtirodu …..chi en words use madtio nachike agbeku nin janmakke thu ninna ….
@ Naveen ಅವರೆ,
Pdo gps.. agbeku antha asse eddare…dayavittu e blog yaru betti.kodbedi…..e blog olaga only agady erorge eday
ನೋಡಿ ಈ ರೀತಿ ಈ ಬ್ಲಾಗ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಸಂದೇಶ ರವಾನಿಸಿದರೆ ಯಾರೂ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮಾತು ಕೇಳಲ್ಲ ಅದನ್ನು
ಪಿ.ಡಿ.ಓ, ಜಿ.ಪಿ.ಎಸ್.. ಆಗ್ಬೇಕು ಅಂತಾ ಆಸೆ ಇದ್ದರೆ, ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ಈ ಬ್ಲಾಗ್ನಲ್ಲಿ ಪತ್ಯುತ್ತರ ನೀಡಬೇಡಿ ಎಂದು ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ, ಯಾಕಂದ್ರೆ ಬೇಟಿ ನೀಡಬೇಡಿ ಅಂದ್ರೆ ಯಾರು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಕೇಳಲ್ಲ…
@ SUMA ಅವರೆ “Good sandesha avare ninna e comment healthey agiday…thanks for healthy information”
ನಾಳೆ ದಿನ ಇದೇ ರೀತಿ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕಛೇರಿಗೆ ನಕಲಿ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ/forgery ಬಂದು ಅಹವಾಲು ಕೊಟ್ಟರೆ, ಪರಾಮರ್ಶಿಸದೇ ನಿರ್ಣಯ ಕೈಗೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತೀರಾ….. ?
Nivu nimma msg duplicate. ..chi hachappa hogu…sumne bere examka odako…nanna magalu allredya.selection agidale…ninenu donney nayaka heloke…hogu bere kelasa madu..
ನೋಡಿ ಭಾವೋದ್ವೇಗಕ್ಕೊಳಗಾದಾಗ ಇಂತ ಮಾತುಗಳು ಬರುವುದು ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ … ಕ್ಷಮೆ ಇದೆ
ಏಕೆಂದರೆ ನೀವು ನನ್ನ ತಾಯಿ ಇದ್ದ ಹಾಗೆ. ಕೆಲವೊಮ್ಮೆ ತಾಯಿಯು ಬಯ್ಯ್ಯಬಹುದು. ಪರವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ ನಿಜಾಂಶ ತಿಳಿದೇ ರೀತಿ ,,,,,,
ದಿನಾಂಕ 14/07/2017 ರ ಸಾಯಂಕಾಲ 04:55 [IST] ಯಿಂದ ದಿನಾಂಕ 15/07/2017 ರ ಪೂರ್ವಾಹ್ನ 10/14 [IST] ಮಧ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ “ಸಂದೇಶ್” ಎಂಬ ಹೆಸರಿನಿಂದ ಬಂದಿರುವ ಸಂದೇಶಕ್ಕೂ “SANDHESH” ಎಂಬ ಹೆಸರಿನವನಾದ ನನಗೆ ಯಾವುದೇ ಸಂಬಂಧವಿರುವುದಿಲ್ಲವೆಂದು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ತಿಳಿಯಪಡಿಸುತ್ತೇನೆ
-ಸಂದೇಶ್
♣ಸೂಚನೆ♣
ನೋಡಿ ಭಾವಿ ಪಿಡಿಓಗಳೆ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ಪದನಾಮ ಇರುವ ಸಂದೇಶ್ ನಾನಲ್ಲ… ನನ್ನ ಹೆಸರನ್ನು ದುರ್ಬಳಕೆ ಮಾಡಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ….
@sandesh
Ninobba pramanika!?
Yestantha game adtidiya? Otnalli yellaru avre andangaytu.?
.
nodona nimella ahankar darpa dourjyana kke samaya ne uttara kodutte
nimge nijamsha helidre nambtilla amele nimge jyanodaya agutte
navu yavde tara gondaladalli ella sandhesh ninu sulu helta tirgadbeda
ennu bere avra hesralli comment mado jaroori ella avru sumne nim dari tapsokke hag madtiidare
eno info kodona anno udesha adre nivu muttalara matu nambtidiri
Dindinda dinakke stay sanbhava hechhagtide antha helidralla , nim maneli adar meter ideya? Dinalu rating torsoke . Athava court nimage dinalu letter kalsitideya?
Athva 13th hearingnalli judge yenadru helidra next hearing nalli stayvkodtivi anta?
Reply
@girish .
Ninobba sullugar.
Mathu illi comment maduva nin uddesh keaval vikrutha ananda.
I can give clarity for this!
swamy tavu first tamma bagge clarification kodipa
nim hesru adru haki ellarigi gottagali adu bittu sumne elli nanna sullugara antha yake heltiya
nanu first inda cases mugiyovargu results barolla anthane heltidini
adre elli yaryaro case dismiss agutte results evattu nale antha helidru
aga elli hogidde ninu ? ega nanna yake prashne madtiya
sumne elli elru timepass comments comedy sigutte antha eneno madtitidare adre
hinde sakasttu vichargalu evra gamanakke bartilla
adannu heldire nambtilla ]
adu avra karma
ninu sullugaranae
@girisha
Illi jaasti marks tegiddoru pramanika n avar prayatna dinda alde prayatna padade kastapattu odade istu marks tegiyokke agalla …..kadime bandive anta hottekichhu padod bittu kastapattu next exam ge prepare aagu …..enu gondalagalu illa expert committee avaru expert iddalle aa stanakke hogiddu tilko ……iro jeevana nadru kushi inda kali ….anyaya agidre nin support ge ellaru bartidru nodu ivag ni obne irodu ….idrinda gottagutte nindu samajika nyaya alla
Na pdo agtilla anno swartakkagi madtidiya ……ellarinda hidi shapahakiskondu mundin janmadalli adenagi huttio tarigottu ……abbabba andre 20 varsha badakbhudu adakke ellargu bekagi hogu illandre ninge swarga alla narakadallu entry irodilla ……bye
Vijay antha randimaklu 15 days adu edu antha first inda sullu helta bartidare 27 case hearing ede judgement alla
Ennu sakasttu sala case hearings ad mele judgement kododu
Matte case mugiyovargu yavde karanakku results bidokke barolla
Enthavara matu nambedri nimgene nastta
Iga nanu pakka heltini girish mathu anand obbane. 2 hesarininda comment haktidane. Shame on you girish. It ahows your honesty!???
ninna honesty ellidiye magu ?
sumne …. antha comment madidre
magu ninge time pass bekalava sakasttu games edave adannu aaata adu
Otnalli ninu opkonde alwa anada girisha obbane antha sak bidu.
Magu …… ninna condition artha agutte but bere darine ella swalpa
osi samadhana madko pa magu
eneno huchara hage heliddi yavdu agtilla
sumne elli bogalo naayi agbeda
nin thikamuchkond iru astte
ಲೋ ಗಿರೀಶ , ನಿನ್ನ ನಾನು ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕ ಅನ್ಕೊಂಡಿದ್ದೆ. ಆದ್ರೆ ನೀನು ಬಿಲ್ಡ್ ಅಪ್ ಗೋಸ್ಕರ. ಆನಂದ್ ಅನ್ನೋ ಹೆಸರಲ್ಲಿ ನಿನಗೆ ನೀನೇ ಸುಪ್ಪೋರ್ಟಿಇಂಗ ಕ್ಯಾರ್ಎಕ್ಟ್ರ್ ನಿಭಾಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದಿಯ. ಇದರಿಂದ ಗೊತ್ತಾಗುತ್ತೆ ಕಣೋ ನಿನ್ ಬಂಡವಾಳ. ಸುಮ್ನೆ ಅಮಾಯಕರನ್ನು ಹೆದರಿಸೂದೆ ನಿನ್ನ ಉದ್ದೇಶ. ಯಾಕಂದ್ರೆ ಕೇಸ್ ಹಾಕಿದವರೇ. ಇನ್ನು ಗೊಂದಲದಲ್ಲಿ ಇದ್ದಾರೆ. ನೀನು ಕೇಸ್ ಕೂಡ ಹಾಕಿಲ್ಲ.
ಆದರೆ ನಿನು ಉಹೆ ಮಾಡ್ಕೊಂಡು ಇಷ್ಟೆಲ್ಲ ಮಾತಾಡ್ತಿಯ. Keep It up
Good sandesha avare ninna e comment healthey agiday…thanks for healthy information
sandesha ninu madhya dalli bandidiya madhyadalle hogtiya
ninge ninna nijavada hesru no address haki comment madu aga ninna pramanikathe nambtini adu bittu sumne nanna pramanikathe yake prashne madtiya?
navu yavde tara gondala dalli ella
sumne eneno helbeda
@beggar girish : first nindu number haku
Magu vijay ninna condition artha agutte but bere darine ella swalpa
osi samadhana madko pa magu
eneno huchara hage heliddi yavdu agtilla
sumne elli bogalo naayi agbeda
nin thikamuchkond iru astte
suma madam samadhana madkolli adu bittu bere darine ellavalla?
HUCCHARA TARA MATADBEDA…..ASST PROF….KAS…..FDA..SDA…CASE INNU NADEETIVE KAT NALLI…..ALMOST ALL PROCESS R OVER IN THESE RECRUITMENTS…..SEE CAUSELISTS IN KAT
ninu hucchara hage yake comment madtidiya ondu hesralli comment madu
ninge ade hale hucchu aa cases ella bere reasons mele agiddu
but pdo du berene ede adu ninge artha agilla
sumne wait madu ninge gottagutte
@beggar girish, ananda : nimma appa Randi maga haduke nevu yella Randi tara hadthiri
@beggar girish, ananda : nimma appa Randi maga haduke nevu yella Randi tara hadthiri, Loafer fellows
Magu vijay ninna condition artha agutte but bere darine ella swalpa
osi samadhana madko pa magu
eneno huchara hage heliddi yavdu agtilla
sumne elli bogalo naayi agbeda
nin thikamuchkond iru astte
Chances of stay may be expected
In next hearings
Sorry to say but this is true
I don’t know where it goes but at last only target is to get the ultimate social justice to everyone
I have under gone sleepless nights because of pdo irregularities and it’s beneficiaries.
Many are selfish and want to get the job by means of non merit and irregularities not even thinking of those meritorious students.
Who are really worked hard and confident about thier section why do they worry? what’s there in writing exam at once ?
It’s not a matter of few who were selected but of those many who aren’t selected because of this.
I m of the opinion that RE EXAM
Only gives the Ultimate justice
Thanks all
Girisha re exam madsde bidbeda aste . Ivella yest agutte ast harkonli
ಅಯ್ಯೋ ಲೋಪರ್ ನನ್ನ ಮಗನೆ
Le sandhesha
Enu nin samasye
Sumne muchkond irokke agolva athava ninge nijavada baigula beka
Naayi bala donku kattege latti pettu hage ningu beka sumne nin thika amonkond iru le sandhu
@girish beggar : shout for another 15days,
Nimantha shata dadda murkha shikamani galu ellr dari tappistidare
Another 15 days heg agutte
yakandre 27 hearing ede judgement alla
Hat chal bosideke nimantha sule maklu …
@ Beggar girish : nimma appa judge alla, adhuke 27th judgement kodthana
Magu vijay ninna condition artha agutte but bere darine ella swalpa
osi samadhana madko pa magu
eneno huchara hage heliddi yavdu agtilla
sumne elli bogalo naayi agbeda
nin thikamuchkond iru astte
Alli nodidhre ellru verification ge ready agthidhare. . Nin nodidhre re exam anthiyallo maraya. . .nin ello flip agidhiya antha anusthidhe.. .department avru bega training schedule . . Sindhuthwa na joining adhmele madusoke time kodtharanthe.. . Maximum ANDHRE december olage avr avr district nalle training . . . . Re exam madusthini antha elbeda . . Reexam ANDHRE ninna yaru namballa . . Re revise antha elu swalpa jana nambthare
. . .
Maga girisha tale keduskobeda. Let them bark
Magu rahul verification list bidokke 3 tinglu beka
sumnne huchha payli gathe yake matadtiya
sandu ninadru helappa result yavag anta
ಸಂದೇಶ್ ಸರ್ PDO ರಿಸಲ್ಟ್ ಇನ್ನೂ ಎಷ್ಟು ಸಮಯದ ನಂತರ ಬರಬಹುದೆಂದು ಅಂದಾಜಿಸುತ್ತಿರಿ
ನಿಮ್ಮಲ್ಲಿ ನನಗೆ ವಿಶ್ವಾಸವಿದೆ ………
Avnobba Donne nayaka avnig enu gotilla.
Beter you ask Girish
Hadal geereshaaa yelhodo yenadru info kodale .
Expecting you here
8971559574 add this no pdo watapps group
Pdo gps.. agbeku antha asse eddare…dayavittu e blog yaru betti.kodbedi…..e blog olaga only agady erorge eday
DAYAVITTU DIST LIST NALLIRUVA CANDIATES ANDRE SELECT AGIRUVA CANDIATES LEAVE THIS MOLLAD GROUP .AND JOIN THE SREEDAR ADMIN GROUP.
Bittu yelhogtira hale hendatine vasi anta vapas bartira aste
8971559574 add this no pdo wattsapp group sir shridar sir
cb ravi . uk result yavag yenadru information kodi c.e.t process 16 ke complete agutte nantara pdo result nirikshane madabahuda
@….. ಕೆ.ಇ.ಎ ಅಥವಾ.ಕೆಎಟಿ ನ ಕೇಳು ಅದು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಯಾರಲ್ಲಿ ಕೇಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದೀರಿ… ಪಿಡಿಓ ಅಗುವವರ ಲಕ್ಷಣವಾ ಇದು..
Today pdo results diclear
ಯಾಕಪ್ಪ ತಪ್ಪು ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಕೊಡ್ತಿಯಾ..
Sari mahaiti yar kodakatar app
ವಾಟ್ಸಫ್ ಗ್ರೂಪ್ಗಳು ದಿನೇ ದಿನೇ ಕಳೆದಂತೆ ತನ್ನ ವರ್ಚಸನ್ನು ಕಳೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿದೆ….ನಾನೊಮದು ತೀರ ನೀನೊಂದು ತೀರವಾಗಿದೆ…..
ಹಾಗಾದ್ರೆ ನಮ್ಮ ವಾಟ್ಸಾಪ್ ಗ್ರೂಪ್ ಸೇರು.
ಗ್ರೂಪ್ ನೇಮ್ ಏನು?
Guru Sandesh
Illi malpractice agilla Mattu golmal nedilla. So cancel madak agalla
Girisha re exam madse madustane nodtairu
Kondyag dam idare re exam madas nodun
ಕಂದಾ ಸಂದೇಶ,
ಆದಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ನಿನಗೆ ಜ್ಞಾನೋದಯ ಆಗಲಿದೆ.
ನಿರೀಕ್ಷೆಯಲ್ಲಿರು.
Lo UK began list bidso 6 months inda Kelsa illa HK patil n cm na meet madi yenadru mado maharaya
Page 1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5680-83 OF 2017
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.19570-19573 OF 2016)
Gohil Vishvaraj Hanubhai & Others … Appellants
Versus
State of Gujarat & Others … Respondents
J U D G M E N T
CHELAMESWAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are preferred against the final judgement
dated 27 June 2016 of the High court of Gujarat in Letters Patent
Appeal No. 73 of 2016 in Special Civil Application No. 11149 of
2015 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 74 of 2016 in Civil
Application No. 11685 of 2015 with Civil Application No.1066 of
2016 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 74 of 2016 with Special Civil
Application No 11149 of 2015. The facts leading to the instant
litigation are as follows:
1
Page 2
3. The Appellants herein are candidates who successfully
appeared in the examination conducted by the Respondents for
recruitment to the post of Revenue Talati but were not appointed.
4. The State of Gujarat decided to create a new post of
Revenue Talati, under the control of the Revenue Department.
Revenue talatis are to maintain revenue records, collect revenue
etc. The creation of these posts is meant to ease the burden on
existing talati-cum-mantris who were under the control of the
Panchayat Department, performing duties relating to
maintenance of land records and various duties incidental
thereto.
5. A total of 1800 posts of Revenue Talati were created by a
Government Resolution dated 23.10.2008. Ordinarily recruitment
to such post is carried out by Gujarat Subordinate Service
Selection Board (GSSSB). The board was requested to do so. The
board expressed its inability to undertake the task within the
time frame decided by the state.
6. Given the urgency of the situation, the Revenue board of the
State of Gujarat decided to undertake the recruitment process by
itself. The proposal was approved by the State by a Resolution
2
Page 3
dated 4.12.2013 (for convenience GR-I) of the General
Administration Department. By another GR dated 11.12.2013,
the Revenue Talati Recruitment Committee (hereafter
COMMITTEE) was constituted under the chairmanship of
Revenue Inspection Commissioner, who is an Ex-Officio
Secretary to the State of Gujarat with Collector, Ahmedabad and
Collector, Gandhinagar and Joint Secretary of Revenue
department as Members of the COMMITTEE, to “carry out the
procedure of direct recruitment” and matters incidental thereto and
subject to the various limitations imposed under the said GR.
The COMMITTEE decided to avail the assistance of Gujarat
Technological University (hereinafter GTU) for conducting the
examination.1
7. On 15.1.2014 an advertisement for filling up of 1500 posts
of Revenue Talatis was published. Performance of the candidates
at an objective type written examination for 100 marks was
stipulated to be the basis for selection. The examination was
conducted in 2691 centres spread over 33 districts. 7,53,703
candidates appeared in the examination.
1 The Recruitment Committee has resolved to hand over the procedure of setting question paper, taking
examination and declaring results, thereof, to the Gujarat Technological University, and hence, for the aforesaid
purpose, you are requested to send the rates chargeable for each procedure to the Department, at the earliest. –
Letter of the Member Secretary, Recruitment Committee to Registrar, GTU dated 15.1.2014
3
Page 4
8. A day prior to the examination, i.e., 15.02.2014, a crime
was registered in F.I.R. No.46 of 2014 in Sector-7 police station,
Gandhinagar under sections 406, 420 and 144 of the Indian
Penal Code against two persons, namely Kalyanish Mulsinh and
Nileshbhai Umeshbhai Shah. The allegation is that they had
collected money from some of the candidates who were to appear
in the said examination by assuring them appointments.
9. However the examination process went ahead. In the
process of evaluating the OMR sheets, it was noticed that a large
number of OMR sheets had specific markings. On 26.05.2014 the
police authorities informed the Chairman of the COMMITTEE
that during interrogation of the two arrested persons, it emerged
that they had advised the candidates to put a ‘b’ mark on the
right side of the OMR sheet.
10. Thereafter, the entire data was sent to a forensic science
laboratory for further investigation. The investigation revealed
284 OMR sheets with the specific mark. The COMMITTEE
decided to eliminate those candidates from consideration.
Therefore, a provisional merit list was declared on 10.10.2014.
8465 candidates were placed in the list.
4
Page 5
11. In the meanwhile, complaints were received by different
authorities of the State alleging the commission of a large
number of malpractices in connection with the examination:
– a complaint from Bhubhai Damor on 17.10.2014.
– The Collector, Sabrakantha District forwarded a
complaint received by him from Mr R.D. Patel
detailing various irregularities.
– Similar complaint of irregularities was addressed
to the Principal Secretary, General
Administration Department by one Kameshbhai
from Rupakheda, District Dahod.
– Another complaint was filed in the local crime
branch of Surendranagar against one Hiren
Narottambhai Kaoisha alleging that he had
collected an amount of Rs.1.55 crores from 62
candidates.
– Further complaint alleging that one Dhirubhai
Bhil, who was working as a peon in the office of
the Secretary, Land Reforms and one woman
5
Page 6
employee from the same office had accepted
money from a number of candidates promising to
ensure that these candidates would clear the
examination. The Secretary, Land Reforms was
also the Chairman of the Recruitment
Committee.
12. In view of receipt of a large number of complaints, the
COMMITTEE probed into the matter. Some irregularities were
noticed. For example, 127 candidates belonging to one family
were placed in the provisional merit list. 178 candidates were
found to have given same residential addresses. Both these sets
of candidates had 47 candidates in common etc.
13. The COMMITTEE thought it fit to cancel the entire
examination process. Accordingly, Government issued orders by
a Resolution dated 03.07.2015 (hereafter GR-II) cancelling the
recruitment process. It was further ordered inter alia thereunder:
“3. On cancelling the entire recruitment procedure for
filling-up the 1500 posts of Revenue Talati class and by adding
900 vacancies from the other years, it is, hereby, resolved to
fill-up the total 2400 posts through Gujarat Subsidiary Service
Selection Board.
4. As stated at No.1, the candidates, whose name figured in
the list, whose upper age limit is about to attain, now, as they
shall not be entitled to appear in the examination that shall be
6
Page 7
conducted now, as a special case, a relaxation of five years is
given in the upper age limit.”
14. Aggrieved by the abovementioned GR, the appellants herein
filed a Writ Petition (Special Civil Application No.11149/2015)
seeking a declaration that the GR was illegal and arbitrary.
Further the Petitioners filed an application (Civil Application No.
11685 of 2015) seeking to restrain the Respondents from
publishing any fresh advertisements for recruitment. The Gujarat
High Court vide an Interim Order dated 14.12.2015 disposed of
Civil Application No.11685 of 2015 allowing the Respondents to
proceed with fresh recruitment for 980 seats. The Petitioners filed
LPAs No.73 and 74 of 2016 challenging the 14.12.2015 order.
The Petitioners also filed an application seeking a stay on fresh
recruitment being LPA No.74/2016. The Gujarat High Court
dismissed all applications and appeals vide the impugned
judgment holding that the decision of the COMMITTEE was not
unreasonable since there was some material on the basis of
which the decision was made, viz. the various allegations that
have cast a shadow over the sanctity of the recruitment process.
Hence this appeal.
7
Page 8
15. The appellants argued (i) that cancellation of the
examination without any investigation or proof of the allegations
of a vitiated examination process is illegal; (ii) the legality of the
GR-II must be tested on the touchstone of the principle of
‘Wednesbury Reasonableness’ and the principle of
proportionality; (iii) Tested in the light of the twin principles
mentioned above, the decision of the COMMITTEE is both
unreasonable and disproportionate to the alleged mischief,
unreasonable since it is based on the irrelevant consideration of
the embarrassment caused to the government and
disproportionate since the allegations pertain to a small number
of candidates whose candidature could have been segregated and
rejected.
16. Two questions need to be examined:
(1) What are the principles which govern the
jurisdiction of the Courts which exercise the
power of judicial review of administrative action
in the context of a situation like the one
presented by the facts of these appeals;
(2) Whether those legal principles are strictly
followed by the respondents while taking the
impugned decision?
8
Page 9
17. The basic principles governing the judicial review of
administrative action are too well settled. Two judgments which
are frequently quoted in this regard are – Associated Provincial
Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation2 and Council
of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for Civil Service3.
18. Lord Diplock in his celebrated opinion in Council of Civil
Service Unions summarised the principles as follows:
“… Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when
without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the
development has come about, one can conveniently classify
under three heads the grounds upon which administrative
action is subject to control by judicial review. The first ground I
would call “illegality,” the second “irrationality” and the third
“procedural impropriety.” That is not to say that further
development on a case by case basis may not in course of time
add further grounds. I have in mind particularly the possible
adoption in the future of the principle of “proportionality” which
is recognised in the administrative law of several of our fellow
members of the European Economic Community; but to dispose
of the instant case the three already well-established heads that
I have mentioned will suffice. By “illegality” as a ground for
judicial review I mean that the decision-maker must
understand correctly the law that regulates his decision-making
power and must give effect to it. Whether he has or not is par
excellence a justiciable question to be decided, in the event of
dispute, by those persons, the judges, by whom the judicial
power of the state is exercisable. By “irrationality” I mean what
can by now be succinctly referred to as “Wednesbury
unreasonableness” (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v.
Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223). It applies to a
decision which is so outrageous in its defiance of logic or of
accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had
applied his mind to the question to be decided could have
arrived at it. Whether a decision falls within this category is a
2 (1948) 1 KB 223
3 1984 3 All ER 935 (HL)
9
Page 10
question that judges by their training and experience should be
well equipped to answer, or else there would be something
badly wrong with our judicial system. To justify the court’s
exercise of this role, resort I think is today no longer needed to
Viscount Radcliffe’s ingenious explanation in Edwards v.
Bairstow [1956] AC 14 of irrationality as a ground for a court’s
reversal of a decision by ascribing it to an inferred though
unidentifiable mistake of law by the decision-maker.
“Irrationality” by now can stand upon its own feet as an
accepted ground on which a decision may be attacked by
judicial review. I have described the third head as “procedural
impropriety” rather than failure to observe basic rules of
natural justice or failure to act with procedural fairness towards
the person who will be affected by the decision. This is because
susceptibility to judicial review under this head covers also
failure by an administrative tribunal to observe procedural rules
that are expressly laid down in the legislative instrument by
which its jurisdiction is conferred, even where such failure does
not involve any denial of natural justice. But the instant case is
not concerned with the proceedings of an administrative
tribunal at all.”
It can be seen from the above extract, Lord Diplock identified
three heads under which judicial review is undertaken, i.e.,
illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. He also
recognised the possibility of new heads such as ‘proportionality’
being identified in future. He explained the concepts of the three
already identified heads. He declared that the head ‘irrationality’
is synonymous with ‘Wednesbury unreasonableness’.
19. The principle laid down in Council of Civil Service Unions
has been quoted with approval by this Court in Tata Cellular v.
10
Page 11
Union of India4 and Siemens Public Communication v. Union
of India5.
20. Normally while exercising the power of judicial review,
Courts would only examine the decision making process of the
administrative authorities but not the decision itself. The said
principle has been repeatedly stated by this Court on number of
occasions.6
21. We shall now examine the questions raised by the
appellants in the light of the abovementioned principles in which
judicial review of administrative action is undertaken.
The 1st submission of the appellant is that there is no proof
of tampering with the examination process on a large scale as
asserted by the respondent, but there are only allegations of such
tampering, the truth of which has never been tested by any
established process of law. Therefore, the decision of the
respondent to cancel the examination in its entirety is without
any basis in law.
4 (1994) 6 SCC 651
5 AIR 2009 SC 1204
6 Chairman, All India Railway Recruitment Board Vs. K Shyam Kumar, ( 2010) 6 SCC 614 at para 21; Sterling
Computers Ltd. v. M.N. Publications Ltd., (1993) 1 SCC 445; State of A.P. v. P.V. Hanumantha Rao, (2003) 10
SCC 121
11
Page 12
22. Purity of the examination process – whether such
examination process pertains to assessment of the academic
accomplishment or suitability of candidates for employment
under the State – is an unquestionable requirement of the
rationality of any examination process. Rationality is an
indispensable aspect of public administration under our
Constitution7. The authority of the State to take appropriate
measures to maintain the purity of any examination process is
unquestionable. It is too well settled a principle of law in light of
the various earlier decisions of this Court that where there are
allegations of the occurrence of large scale malpractices in the
course of the conduct of any examination process, the State or its
instrumentalities are entitled to cancel the examination.8 This
7 Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India & Others, (1979) 3 SCC 489
8 Nidhi Kaim v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others, (2016) 7 SCC 615 at para 23: “Even otherwise, the
argument of the appellants is required to be rejected for the following reasons: Under the scheme of our
Constitution, the executive power of the State is co-extensive with its legislative power. In the absence of any
operative legislation, the executive power could certainly be exercised to protect the public interest. The right of
each one of the appellants herein for admission to the medical colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh is itself
an emanation of the State’s executive action. No doubt, even executive action of the State can create rights.
Unless there is something either in the Constitution or law which prohibits the abrogation or abridgment of
rights, it is permissible for the State to do so by executive action in accordance with some specified procedure of
law. No doubt, that the overarching requirement of Constitution is that every action of the State must be
informed with reason and must be in public interest. Nothing has been brought to our notice which prohibits the
impugned executive action. If it is established that the adoption of unfair means on large scale resulted in the
contamination of the entrance examination (PMT) process of successive years, the State undoubtedly would
have the power to take appropriate action to protect the public interest. I, therefore, reject the submission of the
appellants.”;
In the case of Union of India v. Anand Kumar Pandey, 1994 5 SCC 663 large scale cheating occurred
in the Railway Recruitment Board Examination, specifically in two rooms of a center. The Board took a
decision to subject the successful candidates from that center to a re-examination. This was set aside by the
Central Administrative Tribunal on the ground that such a decision was taken in violation of the principles of
natural justice. It was held that there cannot be any straight-jacket formula for the application of the principles of
natural justice. This Court did not find any fault with the decision to conduct a fresh examination.;
In the case of Chairman All India Railway Recruitment Board & Another v. K. Shyam Kumar &
Others, 2010 6 SCC 614, large-scale malpractices surfaced in the written test. The recruitment board ordered a
12
Page 13
Court has on numerous occasions approved the action of the
State or its instrumentalities to cancel examinations whenever
such action is believed to be necessary on the basis of some
reasonable material to indicate that the examination process is
vitiated. They are also not obliged to seek proof of each and every
fact which vitiated the examination process.9
23. Coming to the case on hand, there were allegations of large
scale tampering with the examination process. Scrutiny of the
answer sheets (OMR) revealed that there were glaring aberrations
which provide prima facie proof of the occurrence of a large scale
tampering of the examination process. Denying power to the
State from taking appropriate remedial actions in such
circumstances on the ground that the State did not establish the
truth of those allegations in accordance with the rules of evidence
relevant for the proof of facts in a Court of law (either in a
criminal or a civil proceeding), would neither be consistent with
the demands of larger public interest nor would be conducive to
the efficiency of administration. No binding precedent is brought
retest, which was challenged in the Central Administrative Tribunal. The tribunal held that a retest was valid.
High Court reversed invoking the wednesbury’s principles of reasonableness. This Court held that in the face of
such large scale allegations supported by reports of the vigilance department and the CBI, the High Court was
wrong in reversing the tribunal’s decision.
9 Nidhi Kaim v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others, (2016) 7 SCC 615 see para 42.1 and 42.2 at 649
13
Page 14
to our notice which compels us to hold otherwise. Therefore, the
1st submission is rejected.
24. The next question is whether the impugned decision could
be sustained judged in the light of the principles of ‘Wednesbury
unreasonableness’. In the language of Lord Diplock, the principle
is that “a decision which is so outrageous in its defiance of logic or of
accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind
to the question to be decided could have arrived at it”. Having regard to
the nature of the allegations and the prima facie proof indicating
the possibility of occurrence of large scale tampering with the
examination process which led to the impugned action, it cannot
be said that the impugned action of the respondent is “so
outrageous in its defiance of logic” or “moral standards”.
Therefore, the 2nd submission of the appellant is also required to
be rejected.
25. We are left with the 3rd question – whether the magnitude of
the impugned action is so disproportionate to the mischief sought
to be addressed by the respondents that the cancellation of the
entire examination process affecting lakhs of candidates cannot
be justified on the basis of doctrine of proportionality.
14
Page 15
26. The doctrine of proportionality, its origin and its application
both in the context of legislative and administrative action was
considered in some detail by this Court in Om Kumar & Others
v. Union of India, (2001) 2 SCC 386.
This Court drew a distinction between administrative action
which affects fundamental freedoms10 under Articles 19(1) and 21
and administrative action which is violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India. This Court held that in the context of the
violation of fundamental freedoms;
“54. ….. the proportionality of administrative action affecting
the freedoms under Article 19(1) or Article 21 has been
tested by the courts as a primary reviewing authority and
not on the basis of Wednesbury principles. It may be that
the courts did not call this proportionality but it really was.
This Court, thereafter took note of the fact that the Supreme
Court of Israel recognised proportionality as a separate ground in
administrative law to be different from unreasonableness.
27. It is nobody’s case before us that the impugned action is
violative of any of the fundamental freedoms of the appellants.
We are called upon to examine the proportionality of the
administrative action only on the ground of violation of Article 14.
10 See paras 52 to 54
15
Page 16
It is therefore necessary to examine the principles laid down by
this Court in this regard.
This Court posed the question in Omkar’s Case;
61. When does the court apply, under Article 14, the
proportionality test as a primary reviewing authority and when
does the court apply the Wednesbury rule as a secondary
reviewing authority? From the earlier review of basic principles,
the answer becomes simple. In fact, we have further guidance
in this behalf.
and concluded;
“66. It is clear from the above discussion that in India where
administrative action is challenged under Article 14 as being
discriminatory, equals are treated unequally or unequals are
treated equally, the question is for the Constitutional
Courts as primary reviewing courts to consider
correctness of the level of discrimination applied and
whether it is excessive and whether it has a nexus
with the objective intended to be achieved by the
administrator. Here the court deals with the merits of the
balancing action of the administrator and is, in essence,
applying “proportionality” and is a primary reviewing authority.
67. But where an administrative action is challenged as
“arbitrary” under Article 14 on the basis of E.P. Royappa v.
State of T.N., (1974) 4 SCC 3, (as in cases where punishments
in disciplinary cases are challenged), the question will be
whether the administrative order is “rational” or “reasonable”
and the test then is the Wednesbury test. The courts would
then be confined only to a secondary role and will
only have to see whether the administrator has
done well in his primary role, whether he has acted
illegally or has omitted relevant factors from
consideration or has taken irrelevant factors into
consideration or whether his view is one which no
reasonable person could have taken. If his action does
not satisfy these rules, it is to be treated as arbitrary. In G.B.
Mahajan v. Jalgaon Municipal Council, (1991) 3 SCC 91,
Venkatachaliah, J. (as he then was) pointed out that
“reasonableness” of the administrator under Article 14 in the
16
Page 17
context of administrative law has to be judged from the stand
point of Wednesbury rules. In Tata Cellular v. Union of India,
(1994) 6 SCC 651, Indian Express Newspapers Bombay (P) Ltd.
v. Union of India, (1985) 1 SCC 641, Supreme Court Employees’
Welfare Assn. v. Union of India, (1989) 4 SCC 187, and U.P.
Financial Corpn. V. Gem Cap (India) (P) Ltd., (1993) 2 SCC 299,
while judging whether the administrative action is “arbitrary”
under Article 14 (i.e. otherwise then being discriminatory), this
Court has confined itself to a Wednesbury review always.
68. Thus, when administrative action is attacked as
discriminatory under Article 14, the principle of primary review
is for the courts by applying proportionality. However, where
administrative action is questioned as “arbitrary” under Article
14, the principle of secondary review based on Wednesbury
principles applies.”
28. The submission by the appellants is that the mere fact that
some of the candidates resorted to some malpractice cannot lead
to the conclusion that the entire examination process is required
to be cancelled as it would cause undue hardship to huge
number of innocent candidates. In other words, the appellants
urge this Court to apply the primary review test.
29. We have already held that there were large scale
malpractices at the examination process and the State was
entitled to take appropriate remedial action. In the context of the
occurrence of such malpractice obviously there can be two
classes of candidates: those who had resorted to malpractice and
others who did not. By the impugned action, no doubt, all of
17
Page 18
them were treated alike. Whether such herding together would
amount to the denial of the equal protection guaranteed under
Article 14? is the question.
Identifying all the candidates who are guilty of malpractice
either by criminal prosecution or even by an administrative
enquiry is certainly a time consuming process. If it were to be
the requirement of law that such identification of the wrong doers
is a must and only the identified wrongdoers be eliminated from
the selection process, and until such identification is completed
the process cannot be carried on, it would not only result in a
great inconvenience to the administration, but also result in a
loss of time even to the innocent candidates. On the other hand,
by virtue of the impugned action, the innocent candidates (for
that matter all the candidates including the wrong doers) still get
an opportunity of participating in the fresh examination process
to be conducted by the State. The only legal disadvantage if at all
is that some of them might have crossed the upper age limit for
appearing in the fresh recruitment process. That aspect of the
matter is taken care of by the State. Therefore, it cannot be said
that the impugned action is vitiated by lack of nexus with the
18
Page 19
object sought to be achieved by the State, by herding all the
candidates at the examination together.
30. We see no reason to interfere with the judgment under
appeal. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed, with no order as
to costs.
….………………………….J.
(J. Chelameswar)
…….……………………….J.
(Abhay Manohar Sapre)
New Delhi;
April 28, 2017
19
Kannadalli Type madiddare namma Manassannu muttuttittu
eshtu chennagi Kannada bareyuva neeve Kannadada bagge asadde toridare !!!
ಕುಮಾರ್ ಸಾರ್ ಅವರೆ, ನಾನು ಕನ್ನಡ ಅಭಿಮಾನಿ… ಕನ್ನಡಕ್ಕೆ ಮೊದಲ ಆದ್ಯತೆ…
ನೋಡ್ರಪ್ಪಾ ಇದೇ 2017ರಲ್ಲಿ ಗುಜರಾತ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಅಕ್ರಮದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಸರಕಾರ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡಿರುವ ನಿರ್ಣಯವನ್ನು ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸಿ ಸುಪ್ರೀಮ್ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಏನು ಆದೇಶ ನೀಡಿದೆ ಓದಿ
ಅಕ್ರಮ ನಡೆದಿರುವ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೆ ಅಥವಾ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಗಳು ನಿಯಮಬಾಹಿರವಾಗಿ ನಡೆದುಕೊಂಡ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆಯನ್ನು ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸಿದರೆ, ತಮ್ಮ ಮೂಲಭೂತ ಹಕ್ಕು ಉಲ್ಲಂಘನೆಯಾಗಿದೆ ಎಂದು ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಗಳು ಹೇಳಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವಂತಲ್ಲಿ ಎಂದು ಸುಪ್ರೀಮ್ ಕೋಟ್ ಹೇಳಿದೆ.ಯಾವುದೇ ಪರೀಕ್ಷಾ ಪ್ರಕೃಯೆಯ ಪಾವಿತ್ರ್ಯವನ್ನು ಕಾಪಾಡಲು ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಕ್ರಮಗಳನ್ನು ಕೈಗೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು.ಅದನ್ನು ಯಾರೂ ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸುವಂತಿಲ್ಲ, ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸುವುದಕ್ಕೂ ಮೊದಲು ನಡೆದಿರುವ ಅಕ್ರಮಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಸಾಕ್ಷ್ಯಾಧರಗಳನ್ನು ಕೇಳಬೇಕಾಗಿಯೂ ಇಲ್ಲವೆಂದು ಅದು ಹೇಳಿದೆ.ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ಅಥವಾ ನೇಮಕಾತಿ ಪ್ರಕ್ರೀಯೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸುವ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಅಧಿಕಾರ ಕಸಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದು, ಸಾರ್ವಜನಿಕ ಹಿತಾಸಕ್ತಿ ಮತ್ತು ಆಡಳಿತ ಕಾರ್ಯದಕ್ಷತೆಯ ಹಿತದೃಷ್ಟಿಯಿಂದ ಸರಿಯಾದ ಕ್ರಮವಲ್ಲ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿಗಳಾದ ಜೆ ಚೆಲಮೇಶ್ವರ್ ಮತ್ತು ಅಭಯ್ ಮನೋಹರ್ ಅವರಿದ್ದ ಪೀಠ ಹೇಳಿದೆ, ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಸರಕಾರವು ಕಂದಾಯ ಇಲಾಖೆಯಲ್ಲಿ 1500 ಹುದ್ದೆಗಳನ್ನು ಭರ್ತಿ ಮಾಡಲು ನಡೆಸಿದ್ದ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆಯನ್ನು ಅಕ್ರಮಗಳ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸಿತ್ತು. ಇದನ್ನು ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸಿ ಕೆಲವು ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮಟ್ಟಿಲೇರಿದ್ದರು.
ಅದರ ಆದೇಶ ನೋಡಿ ಮೇಲೆ
e casegu, pdo casegu etthalinda sambhandhavayya???? laddi thumbaiti eno ninga???
13 ಕಳಿಲಿ ಅಂತಾ ಎಷ್ಟು ಜನ ಹೇಳಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಇಲ್ಲಿ …….ಏನಾಗಲ್ಲ ಇದು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಹಣೆಬರಹದ ಹಾಗೆ ಇರುತ್ತೆ ಅಷ್ಟೆ… ಕೆಇಎ ಆಗಲೀ ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಆಗಲೀ…ವಾಟರ್ ಮ್ಯಾನ್ 7 ಅಂತಾ ಉತ್ತರ ನೀಡಿ ಅಂತ್ಯಗೊಳಿಸಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿಲ್ಲ….. ಯಾಕಂದ್ರ ಯಾರು ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಅಂಕ ಗಳಿಸಿದ್ದೀರಿ ನೀವು 7 ಅಂತನೇ ಉತ್ತರಿಸಇರುತ್ತೀರಿ..ಯಾಕಂದ್ರ ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಕೂಡ ಎಲ್ಲೀ ಕೂಡ ನಿಮಗೆ ಇದರ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ [ ಪರೀಕ್ಷಾ ಸಿದ್ದತೆಯ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ] ಸರಿಯಾಗಿದ್ದೇ ಆದರೆ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸಮಯ ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿತ್ತು ಅಷ್ಟೆ…..
Nodi Sandesh girisha re exam madse madustane. No question of rerevision here aste.
Ok
They may conduct re exam for top 500 people from every district
ಏನಪ್ಪ ತಪ್ಪು ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಕೊಡಬೇಡ
Namma uralli water man ge 7th edrene munduvareyok agode anta dodda scene create agittu jothe PDO helidru
Matte bill collector ge 10th kelidre water man ge 10th keltara co mom sense
Lo mangan thulle. . . Objection hakoke time kottaga yar shata therithidhe. . . . . . Answer enu antha decide madodhu court alla expert commete. . . . Monne 13th ella rdpr secretary meet madidhaga. . Bega order kodthivi antha elidhare. . Kathe vayadsadhru thale beldhilla kelvobrige. . . . . .
Result yavaga?
ರಿ ರಿವೈಸ್ 100%
yarayya ninge heldoru
ನೋಡಿ ನಿನ್ನೆಯ ವಿದ್ಯಾಮಾನ….ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾರು ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಹೊಂದಿದರು…. ಸರಕಾರಕ್ಕಗಲೀ, ಕೆಇಎಗಾಗಲೀ ಯಾವುದೇ ಲಾಭವಿಲ್ಲ… ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ಪೂರಕ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ನನ್ನ ಬಳಿ ಇದೆ….. ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ 10-14 ಅಂಕಗಳ ಬದಲಾವಣೆಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ ಈ ಪ್ರಹಸನಕ್ಕೆ ಇತೀ ಶ್ರೀ ಹಾಡಲಿದೆ
yar kotta mahiti nimge adu sumne mansig bandid helbedi
Don’t worry we will winner
…
.
Ananda
Third gender adak….alley madiskondu..beteyavrgu..thikkada baggene mathadthani…hige efi familyne mejasticke kalisi….kalisu..avru evan bittu hoger…adk pdo darvrdu case hidkondu..obbabbrgu 23000 ..thagondu nanag palu kodthani..andu evath kodala andu
..mejestick hogena…holige hakiskondu baraka???????
Re exam nanu madisthani…cme with joined my grup…girishana whatsg grupge seei…one grup seroke obbarige 23000..1000 members adare…exam change madisodu heguday plan…edu yealla namma shanda shakuni ghandsu girisha plan…ok na
Lo sumne iro Re exam madsak avn duddu yavattu kellila
Nine dodda shanda nin hesralli comment mado takattu ella ninenu bere avrige helodu
Sumne nin mukali muchkond iru
Girish anna hesru kedsbeda
Ninge duddu bekadre majestic GE bandu nin thika hadsko
Annan nennu olle pada balsu
Ninagalla
Adu david ge
Sorry adu HMK GE heliddu avnu girish anna hesru kedsita edane
@Uk ningu nanu adanne helodu neenu gandsadre list bidsu adbittu yelrigu reply kotkandu illi tika harkalbeda
Nodu Guru nand ivag kadme bandide . Re exam madsodadre nanu Girish jote iralu ichisutene
Avn hatra agutta annide nanna prashne??
Nange adara avshyakathe ella
Le muttala murkha shikamanigale
Enadru nim kanasina lokandinda bandu e ahankarana bittu
Nijamsha enu antha artha madkolli
Adu bittu elli avarnu evarnnu Baidu prayojana ella yakandre edu aspirants GE loss
Arta madso annandaa
Re exam madso Lo plz geereshaaa
Tunne undru reexam avnkaili madsak agalla
cases again postponed
guys girish is doing wonderful job
i met him directly today he is really talented and committed person
some one made bad comments on his name
girish bahala olle jana elli yar yaro avra hesralli kettadagi comment madtidare
ene agli girish re exam madso hage kantidie yakandre kea avru pdo exam na serious agi tagondilla
sumne elli baikontha kudbedi nanu girish sir ge re exam beda
just re revision aste madsi antha request adda mele avru nodona andru
ene erli egina mahiti prakara pdo cases matte post pone agidave
court case decision bare vargu yava govt nu enu madokke agolla andre list ge bidugade bhgya ella
ellru freedom park alli upavasa satyagraha madona
nim mobile nos haki ellru
yarige re exam beku ?
yarige re revision beku?
yarige results beku? swarthigalu nam adre saku anno bhanavnbe eddu everenu deshana uddara madtare
samajika nayya ke horata
Howdha Girisha, ninu nihavaglu olleyavane agidre bere hesaralli ninage nine buildup kotkotiraralilla. Tumba chennagi ninage nine bucket hidkondidiya .
Thu nin janmakke.
@Uk Neenge Hegel gotaitu naanu girlish anta bar smart idiya neenu
Nimge neeve hogulkobeku aste. Bere enu madak agalla
Yavudadru dram company GE serkolri girish ravare,patragalige takkanthe jeeva thumbtira.
@ravindran gandsadre e month Alli list bidsu torsu kas officer ante putgosi Alli Kelsa madad bittu illi harkantiya idralle gottagutte yav seeme officer anta modlu neen ias officer Alla yakri sullu helkondu illi comment haktira
Le app ninnanthavar uddesh yen gotha.
Ninu pdo or gpsgo select agidiya. Otnalli ninage liat relies adre saku. Adkke e thara beleyavarage challenge haki information information collect madodu alwa.
Idnella bittu directagi helo. Bega list bidasrappa antha. Thu nin janmakke
27th ge case
Estu dina e blog olga
Giresha helidage nediday…
Pdo gps adavaru…yeadku loyk ella..sumne girish na mathu opogoli….ellandre list bidiagoli…huge case munday hogthane eruthey
Thu nin janmakke.
Yen madodappa opkolludu Andre?
Case going on 23
23 Sunday
8971559574 add this no pdo watsapp group pls
Friends illi ravindran irli Girish Sandesh yaru yara hand baraha bareyuva bramha alla nimmma mele nimge confidence irli and e process ends with happiness don’t worry
Ivattin case enu ayitu ravi sir.
Hi frnds, wt happnd today case?
Le giriaha, yeno nin commentgalo , abbababba..
Le nayi nin ninu yen ankodiyo,
“Re revision ge compromise, illandre re exam madstini.”
Court , Kat kea yellanu nin under idaveno?
Yeno idella yaro Kanda ninu? Nindenadru Buddhi bramane agidiyo hege, olle judge markandeya katju that adtiyalla. Thu ninna….!
9964559573 pls.Add this no to Pdo WhatsApp group pls
Ravindran
nodipa pdo du grace golmal matte ennu sakasttu prashne galu spastathe ella gondalagalu sakasttu eve
ningage sambhanda eelade edru edralli tale haktidiya
uru usabari alli mulla sorigidananthe hage ninu ero job gu samasye agabahudu
yakandre ninu edra bagge alochane mdidre nanu nin bagge alochan madtene aga ningene samasye
nandu Rahadari better don’t come in my way
ninu tappannu encourage madtidiya andre estramele gottagutte nin yogyate entadu
sumne tappage edre re revision ge compromise agtene ella andre re exam madso vargu bidolla
@real beggar girish :nindu 8acre vaala Maru, adhurinda Banda 8 crore dhud India re exam madsu, hudgi Tara mathadu beda, today you meet me in kat, call me, we will discuss face to face . Hudgi Tara yavago bhundu message madubeda
Le Vijay ?
Ninu yadgiri kelsa bittu elli huch payali Tara yake madtidiya
Hogli bidu Kat address ge correct agi ba magu
Nanu white half shirt hakondirtene
Meet madu
Alle nin thika haredu bisadtene
Vaala Enle edu
Hola annu
Ayyo avivekin tandu
@harish: ningu mathu girish beggar ge bhaya, that’s why for safety purpose you come with your sisters, mothers, father’s etc.. , don’t do faltu message, if you have guts than Cal me, we will meet in KAT, since 4 months I am in search for girish beggar, one fine day I will find out beggar girish and harish
Nimma akka du tikka hari
Ninu nim akkandu tangidu thika haritiya Daliy adakke nange heltidiya
Nenu & Girish both will do so everyday you speak the same words, beggars
@all aspirants
Before quitting this blog….
U GIRISH and IDIOT FOLLOWERS(APP…)
I CHALLENGE u up,
how u people REVISE this list…
Noduva ??
@ravindran gandsadre e month Alli list bidsu torsu kas officer ante putgosi Alli Kelsa madad bittu illi harkantiya idralle gottagutte yav seeme officer anta modlu neen ias officer Alla yakri sullu helkondu illi comment haktira
Guys, Select agoke esht marks beke beku ? Pls yaradru heli.
22
35 out of ?
????
Boss PDO ge keliddu.
Yenappa mahaveera ravindran,
navu kea ge hogoke plan Madi 5 days aithu. Adu yellargu gothu. Adre thavu thamma amulyavada salheyannu iga kodtidira, already interested aspirants travelling in train to Banglore, e timelli intha comment hakiddar (……)uddesh namage artha agutte. Devaru Nimage olleyadannu madli.
Nanna advice inda nimma plans change madkolabedi
….
Go with ur plans…..
rpdr secretary, education dept secretary manavi madkoli,freedom park nallu pratibatane madi hego neevu nimma guri talupi….
@Ravindran
Just time pass madoke comments madtare don’t replay to those useless messages.
I hope you understand
@ravindran
sir ega almost aspirents wts app groupali chat madta idare e blogna yaru follow madta illa nivu sridhar groupig sggestion madbahudalva?
nim usefull information illi share madodkinta grp alli madidre ellrige help agutte.groupalli ellrudu possitive thought irutte
Thank you…..so all are busy with their own what’s up group….
Ya then i Will stop messaging in this blog…
First of all illi comment madi anta yaru nimge vilyadele kottu kardirlilla stop madidru yarigu nashta illa nikharavada mahit kodod bittu bayige banda hage yelru comment kododu las officer anta bere helkollodu
@app
Yogyatage takka hage Matadi….nimma loose talks nanna hatirra itikkolabedi…mind ur language…
@app
Neenu yen maha information kottidiya Bandi illi matadakke…….
@ app
Nimma hage naanu bogaluva nayi Alla…..Bari bogali bogali bogali bogatane iddira..
I have said to u come to my office….I have given my address too……summane adannu itkondu nanna target madidare…. it’s not good….
Yaavaudu nimma prakara nikara mahiti…..
nanu hakiro message Nalli sullu iddare heli…
Adu Bittu summane nannanu tikisuvudu…. it’s not good…
Modalu neevu yen mahitina e blog Nalli hakiddira????
Nange 296 bandide select agolla adke re exam madso geereshaaa
Plz.
Frnds inmele e blog alli UK hesralli baro comments ge nanu javabdaranalla. Yawano tale kettawnu nan name use madta iddane. Eno useful information sigatte anta e blog check madta idde enadRu doubts idre comment madta idde. Illi olledakkinta bedade iro vicharagale jasti. So nanu e blog ge good bye helta iddene. Inmele idralli UK anno hesralli comments bandre adyawdakku nanu javabdaranalla. GOOD BYE TO THIS USELESS BLOG.
I’ll bucket hidiyodanna bitre bere yenu illaa
@all aspirants
My advice:if someone going to protest tomorrow
First…Try to get information from kea through RTI
meeting rdpr secretary or education dept secretary is of no use…since kea is an autonomous body….they can draft requisition letter to kea to complete process early…..since requistion…no use
Use mass media….if possible use Prajavani newspaper…. Make it a highlighting issue….
Its My advice…no mandatory to accept it
Yenappa mahaveera ravindran,
navu kea ge hogoke plan Madi 5 days aithu. Adu yellargu gothu. Adre thavu thamma amulyavada salheyannu iga kodtidira, already interested aspirants travelling in train to Banglore, e timelli intha comment hakiddar (……)uddesh namage artha agutte. Devaru Nimage olleyadannu madli.
Frds some one give correct information about Pdo recruitment
@sunil,
Information about pdo recruitment.
This is the recruitement for pdo and gps1 in Karnataka rdpr Dept. Kea is is authority of this selection .And both posts base on any degree. Exam for selection has been conducted in 2017 jan 29. And 2 merit lists also have been reliesed . Now kea has to conduct documents verification.
e groupalli select candidates yaru cmnt madtilla niv nive bere bere nameli re exam revise anta support madkoli avrella wts app grouapalli busy
ha ha ho ho ho he he he…………haluralli ulidone kona…
@ sandesh
@girish
enagutte nale case nimma prakara
Question paper vastunistavagilla, so re exam is the ultimate. Yelru ommata soochisi strike madabahudu
Innonda varsha bittu protest madu’ Andre nin mat kelbahud
Your exactly correct girish
Sandhesha enu nin uddesha
Sumne time pass hita vachana yake heltiya
Ninu este double game adidru
Navu re exam GE namma prayatna jari Alli eruttte
Yaru e sandhesha nambedi
Pdo results yavde karanakku cases mugiyovargu bidolla
Navu kat high court Supreme Court varegu hogtene
Pdo grace kodode dodda golmal
Ennu sakasttu prashnergalu wrong edave
Only solution
Re exam
Have all the solid evidences
Be prepared to face it guys
Thu ninna janamakke…odi pass agu andare …elly helu thinnokke msg madthiya..entha dimaka mado madine e thara bikshe bedo dina bandathi…one chappali holadara 10 rupi siguthey hogu…hudageru pass naderea exam ….nin gandasagi nanchike agalva..hoga mishra thalidavane…ally kea munday handi odadthavu adara helu thinnu..chapalanadru thiruthey
Greesha reexam madso ivaga 296 bandide next bidalla select age agtini.
ಇಲಾಖೆಗಳ ಒಳಗಡೆ ಬಂದರೆ, ಬಡ್ತಿಗೂ ನಮಗೂ ಯಾವುದೇ ಯಾವುದೇ ಸಂಬಂಧವಿಲ್ಲವೆನ್ನುವ ಉನ್ನತ ಮಟ್ಟದ ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು, ಸಮಾನ ಕೆಲಸಕ್ಕೆ ಸಮಾನ ವೇತನ ಕೊಡಿ ಎಂದು ಕೇಳಿದರೆ ಮುಂದಿನ ಆಡಳಿತ ನಡೆಸವರು ಮಾಡಲಿ ನಮಗೆ ಉಳಿತಾಯವಲ್ಲವೇ ಎನ್ನುವ ರಾಜಕಾರಣಿಗಳ ಧೋರಣೆ, ಓಟ್ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕಿಗಾಗಿ ಯಾವುದೋ ಕೌಸಲ್ಯ ಯೋಜನೆ ತರುತ್ತಾರೆ ಅದು ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಬರುವ ಮೊದಲೆ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಒಂದು ಹೆಸರಿಟ್ಟರೆ ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಮತ್ತೊಂದು ಹೆಸರು.. ಈ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಗೆ ನಾವೇ ಒಗ್ಗಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದೊಂದೆ ನಮಗಿರುವ ಆಯ್ಕೆ.
ಜವದ್ಬಾರಿತ ಸ್ಥಾನದಲ್ಲಿರುವವರು ಈ ರೀತಿಯ ಗೊಂದಲಕ್ಕೆ ಆಸ್ಪದ ಕೊಡಬಾರದು… ಈ ಆಧುನಿಕ ಯುಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದು ನೇಮಕಾತಿ ಪರೀಕ್ಷಯನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಿ, ಅದರ ಫಲಿತಾಂಶವನ್ನು ನೀಡಿ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಗೆ ತಿಲಾಂಜಲಿಯನ್ನಿಡುವುದನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಅದಕ್ಕೂ ನನಗೂ ಸಂಬಂದವಿಲ್ಲದಂತಹ ಧೋರಣೆ ಈ ಪ್ರಜಾತಂತ್ಯ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಗೆ ನಾಚಿಕೆಯಾಗಬೇಕು, ಇಂತಹ ಪ್ರಕರಣಗಳನ್ನೆ ನೋಡಿ, ಕೆಲವು ವರ್ಷಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ ಸರ್ವೊಚ್ಚ ನ್ಯಾಯಲಯವು, ಯಾವುದೆ ನೇಮಕಾತಿಯನ್ನು ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿದ 6 ತಿಂಗಳುಗಳು ಮೀರದಂತೆ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯಗೊಳಿಸಬೇಕೆಂದು ಆದೇಶಿಸಿತ್ತು….. ಕಳೆದ ವರ್ಷ ಅಕ್ಟೋಬರ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದು ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿ 10 ತಿಂಗಳು ಕಳೆದರೂ ಅಂತ್ಯಗೊಳ್ಳದೇ ಇರುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಏನನ್ನಬೇಕೋ…?
Sandesh yes neevu helidante vevaste kettide, kettiro vevastege navu hondikollodu hattirada maarga, adanna saripadisodu kashta but anivaryate ide, yenantira?
ತುಂಬಾ ಜನ ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕತೆಯಿಂದ, ಅವಿರತ ಶ್ರಮದಿಂದ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದಾರೆ, ಯಾರದೋ ಬೇಜಾವದ್ಬಾರಿಯಿಂದ ಯಾರ್ಯಾರೋ ಮಾನಸಿಕವಾಗಿ ಕುಗ್ಗುವ ಹಾಗೆ ಮಾಡಿದೆ… ವಿಪರ್ಯಾಸವೇ ಸರಿ…
@Sandesh awre nan kooda pdo atwa gps agi aayke agtene. Revise agli agade irli nange prblm illa. Neewu omme old comments bekadru check madi nodi nanu yawattu nimagagli yaarige agli worste langauge use madilla. Hindina Saturday nanu kea ge cl madiddanna heldaga neewu anumana pattidri.awat nnu nimge bekadre innomme kea open itta anta vicharsi anta helidde. Adre awattu nanu nimge ketta padagalanna use madidna? Kettadagi matado hagidre awatte nanu enadru helta idde.
Sandesh awre Neewu bekadre innomme 2 fake email id inda onde hesralli comment madi check madi nodi. Bt nannanegu illi yaaro nan hesralli comment madta iddare
Sandesh awre god promise helta iddene nanu yawattu worste language use madilla madodu illa. Adyake eradu black inda kanstide nange gottilla. Bcz nanilli nan original email address hakilla. Fake email address kottiddini . Innomme pramana madi helta iddene illi yaro beku antane nan hesralli comment madta iddare.